Case LawHigh Court › Vs.deputy Commissioner Ofincome Tax Circ...

Vs.deputy Commissioner Ofincome Tax Circle 1 (1) Pune v. Mohta, Jj.dated: 5Th January, 2009

High Court 05 Jan 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Vs.deputy Commissioner Ofincome Tax Circle 1 (1) Pune v. Mohta, Jj.dated: 5Th January, 2009
Date of order
05 Jan 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Vs.deputy Commissioner Ofincome Tax Circle 1 (1) Pune v. Mohta, Jj.dated: 5Th January, 2009, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION. INCOME TAX APPEAL No. 676 OF 2007 INOX AIR PRODUCTS LTD. .. vs.DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX CIRCLE 1 (1) PUNE. .. Petitioner. ..Respondent. Mr S. N. Inamdar, Advocate for the Appellant. CORAM: V.C. DAGA,ANDANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ.DATED: 5TH JANUARY, 2009. P.C.:-1.Heard the learned counsel for theParties. 2.Perused the appeal. to costs. (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J) (V.C.DAGA,J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan