Case LawHigh Court › V/S.income Tax Officer 4(3)(1), Mumbai A...

V/S.income Tax Officer 4(3)(1), Mumbai And Ors v. N. R. Borkar, Jj. Dated : 22[Nd] March, 2022

High Court 22 Mar 2022 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
V/S.income Tax Officer 4(3)(1), Mumbai And Ors v. N. R. Borkar, Jj. Dated : 22[Nd] March, 2022
Date of order
22 Mar 2022
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In V/S.income Tax Officer 4(3)(1), Mumbai And Ors v. N. R. Borkar, Jj. Dated : 22[Nd] March, 2022, the High Court (2022) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

PURTIPRASADPARAB IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYDigitally signed byPURTI PRASAD PARABORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONDate: 2022.03.2914:43:24 +0530 WRIT PETITION NO. 2203 OF 2021 Raimaladitya Textile Pvt. Ltd. V/s.Income Tax Officer 4(3)(1), Mumbai and Ors. ….Petitioner …Respondents ---- Mr. Rahul Hakani a/w Mr. Ajay Singh i/b Mr. Sameer G. Dalal for Petitioner.Mr. Anil C. Singh, ASG a/w Mr. Sham V. Walve for Respondents-Revenue. ---- CORAM : K.R. SHRIRAM & N. R. BORKAR, JJ. DATED : 22[nd] MARCH, 2022 P.C. : 1.Learned ASG in fairness submits that in this petition also the problem is similar to the problem that Revenue faced in Writ Petition No.2199 of 2021. 2.Therefore, this petition is also allowed in terms of prayer clause - (a) and (b) which reads as under : (a)that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issueunder Article 226 of the Constitution of India an appropriatedirection, order or a writ, calling for the records of the caseand after satisfying itself as to the legality thereof quash andset aside the notice dated 31.03.2021 issued by theRespondent No.1 under section 148 of the Income Tax Act,1961, being Ex.- ‘I’ hereto; (b)that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issueunder Article 226 of the Constitution of India an appropriatedirection, order or a writ, calling for the records of the caseand after satisfying itself as to the legality thereof quash andset aside the order passed by the Respondent No.1 disposingoff the objections raised by the Petitioner against the reopening of assessment under section 147 of the Income TaxAct, 1961 dated 26/08/2021, being Ex.- ‘N’ hereto. 3. Petition disposed with no order as to costs. (N. R. BORKAR, J.) (K.R. SHRIRAM, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan