V.s.paulraj v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle I
High Court
31 Jul 2018 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · mdubench
Parties
V.s.paulraj v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle I
Date of order
31 Jul 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In V.s.paulraj v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle I, the High Court (2018) decided the matter.
Decision: The Writ Petition is disposed of, with the abovedirection.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 31.07.2018
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.GOVINDARAJ
Writ Petition(MD)No.23452 of 2016
V.S.Paulraj
Vs.
... Petitioner
1. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Circle I,
Office of the Income Tax Department, Tuticorin 628 001.
2. The Commissioner of Income Tax – I, Office of the Income Tax Department, Madurai 625 001.
... Respondents
Prayer:Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of theConstitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directingthe first respondent to return the petition mentioned title deedsseized on 26.07.1995 as per the List of Documents prepared by theAssistant Director of Income Tax (Investigation), Madurai in theresidence of the petitioner at No.60, South New Street, Tuticorin.
For Petitioner : Mr.M.KamalanathanFor Respondents : Mrs.S.Srimathy
Senior Standing counsel for I.T.
O R D E R
The petitioner seeks a direction for return of title deedsseized by the respondent, on 26.07.1995.
2. Even though it is ordered by the respondent that thepetitioner is entitled to return of documents, it was not returnedback to the petitioner.
3. Mrs.S.Srimathy, learned Senior Standing counselappearing for the respondent would report on instructions that thetitle deeds seized by the respondent could not be traced and itwas suggested that the petitioner is entitled to get certifiedcopies from the Registration Department.
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
4. Heard both sides.
5. This Court is of the opinion that instead of forcing thepetitioner to approach the Registration Department, the respondentby themselves can get certified copies from the RegistrationDepartment and hand it over to the petitioner with an non-traceable certificate. Therefore, a direction is given to therespondent to obtain certified copies of the title deeds seizedfrom the petitioner, on 26.07.1995, along with non-traceablecertificate, within a period of eight weeks from the date ofreceipt of a copy of this order.
6. The Writ Petition is disposed of, with the abovedirection. No costs.
Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CO)
/True Copy/
Sub Assistant Registrar(CS-III)
To
1. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Circle I, Office of the Income Tax Department, Tuticorin 628 001.
2. The Commissioner of Income Tax – I, Office of the Income Tax Department, Madurai 625 001.
+ 1 CC TO Mr.M.KAMALANATHAN, ADVOCATE IN SR No. 76014
+ 1 CC TO Mrs.S.SRIMATHY, SENIOR STANDING COUNSEL FOR IT IN SR No.75877
AKV
TE/KAK/SAR-3 : 14/08/2018 : 2P/5C
Writ Petition(MD)No.23452 of 201631.07.2018
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.