Case LawHigh Court › Vs.ramesh v. Shah

Vs.ramesh v. Shah

High Court 29 Jun 2009 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Vs.ramesh v. Shah
Date of order
29 Jun 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Vs.ramesh v. Shah, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal.

Decision: In this view of the matter, appeal stands dismissed in limini for want of substantial question of law with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
srk IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 783 OF 2009 The Commissioner of Income Tax Vs.Ramesh V. Shah ..Appellant ..Respondent Ms. Suchitra Kamble for appellant. Mr. S.C. Tiwari for respondent. P.C. CORAM :- V.C.DAGA & J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. DATE : 29th June, 2009 Heard learned Counsel for the parties. During the course of hearing, we were taken to the impugned order passed by the Tribunal, the question sought to be raised in this appeal revolves around appreciation of evidence and after appreciating the evidence the Tribunal has recorded a clear finding of fact with which no fault can be found. Considering the factual aspect which is based on the appreciation of evidence, no substantial question of law is involved in the present appeal. In this view of the matter, appeal stands dismissed in limini for want of substantial question of law with no order as to costs. (J.P.DEVADHAR,J.) (V.C.DAGA,J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan