Case Law › High Court › Vs.the Chief Commissioner Ofincome Tax I...

Vs.the Chief Commissioner Ofincome Tax Ii And Ors v. Mohta And A.s.gadkari, J. Date : 2Nd December, 2016

High Court 02 Dec 2016 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · newas

Parties

Date of order

02 Dec 2016

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Vs.the Chief Commissioner Ofincome Tax Ii And Ors v. Mohta And A.s.gadkari, J. Date : 2Nd December, 2016, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

1 /1WP-9891-13-52 Nalawade IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 9891 OF 2013 Shri. Santosh S. Ashtekar. ...Petitioner. vs.The Chief Commissioner ofIncome Tax II and ors...Respondents. None for the Petitioner.Mr. Ashok Kotangale h/f Padma Divakar for Respondent No.1. CORAM:ANOOP V. MOHTA AND A.S.GADKARI, J. DATE : 2ND DECEMBER, 2016 P.C. None for the petitioner. Dismissed for default. (A.S.GADKARI, J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.