Vxl India Limited v. Commissioner Of Income Tax And Others
High Court
23 Jul 2013 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Vxl India Limited v. Commissioner Of Income Tax And Others
Date of order
23 Jul 2013
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Vxl India Limited v. Commissioner Of Income Tax And Others, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: We have heard counsel for the parties, perused theimpugned order and in view of the binding precedent in the abovejudgment, the petition is dismissed in terms thereof. [ Rajive Bhalla ] Judge [Dr.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANAAT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.9365 of 1987
Date of decision: July 23, 2013.
VXL India Limited
... Petitioner
v.
Commissioner of Income Tax and others
... Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIVE BHALLAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DR. BHARAT BHUSHAN PARSOON
Present:Ms. Radhika Suri, Advocate, for the petitioner.Shri Denesh Goyal, Advocate for the respondent.
, J. (Oral):
Rajive Bhalla
The petitioner prays for issuance of a writ of certiorari quashingorder dated 25.9.1987, Annexure P-3, passed by the Commissioner ofIncome Tax, Amritsar. Counsel for the petitioner concedes thatcontroversy in the present petition is squarely covered against thepetitioner by a judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court, reported as(1995)216 ITR 759 (SC), Modi Industries Ltd. etc. v. Commissioner ofIncome Tax.
We have heard counsel for the parties, perused theimpugned order and in view of the binding precedent in the abovejudgment, the petition is dismissed in terms thereof.
[ Rajive Bhalla ] Judge
[Dr. Bharat Bhushan Parsoon] Judge
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.