Vyoman Tradelink India Private Limited v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income-Tax,Circle 8(3)(2) & 2 Ors
High Court
10 Jan 2022 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Vyoman Tradelink India Private Limited v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income-Tax,Circle 8(3)(2) & 2 Ors
Date of order
10 Jan 2022
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Vyoman Tradelink India Private Limited v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income-Tax,Circle 8(3)(2) & 2 Ors, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
SHRADDHAKAMLESHTALEKAR
Digitally signed bySHRADDHAKAMLESH TALEKARDate: 2022.01.1211:05:13 +0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 3582 OF 2019
Vyoman Tradelink India Private Limited
...Petitioner
vs.
1. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax,Circle 8(3)(2) & 2 Ors.
...Respondents
Mr. Percy Pardiwalla, Senior Advocate a/w. Mr.Jay N. Bhansali forpetitioner.
Mr.Suresh Kumar for respondent Nos.1 to 3.
CORAM :K.R. SHRIRAM &N. J. JAMADAR, JJ.
DATE :10[th] JANUARY, 2022
(THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCE)
P.C.:
1.Shri Pardiwalla, learned Senior Counsel for petitioner sought leave
to withdraw the petition with liberty to raise all points before theAssessing Officer.
2.Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
(N. J. JAMADAR, J.)
(K.R. SHRIRAM, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue