Case LawHigh Court › Wa/1053/2007 Of T.k.shahal H.musaliar v....

Wa/1053/2007 Of T.k.shahal H.musaliar v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Tvm

High Court 05 Mar 2018 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wa/1053/2007 Of T.k.shahal H.musaliar v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Tvm
Date of order
05 Mar 2018
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Wa/1053/2007 Of T.k.shahal H.musaliar v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Tvm, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Hence, the above appeals are dismissed as infructuous.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK MENON MONDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF MARCH 2018 / 14TH PHALGUNA, 1939 WA.No. 1053 of 2007 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN O.P.NO. 12259/2001, DATED 06-03-2007---------- APPELLANT(S)/PETITIONER : T.K.SHAHAL H.MUSALIAR,S/O.LATE THANGAL KUNJU MUSALIAR, “BELAIRE”, KILIKOLLOOR, KOLLAM. BY ADVS. SRI.ANIL D. NAIR SRI.R.SREEJITH SMT.O.A.NURIYA KUM.SOUMYA PRAKASH KUM.MEKHALA M.BENNY RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENTS : 1. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,A WARD, KOLLAM. BY SRI.P.K.R.MENON, SENIOR COUNSEL ADV. SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, S.C THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 05-03-2018,ALONG WITH W.A.NO.1054 OF 2007 AND W.A.NO. 1062 OF 2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Msd. 21.03.2018 K. VINOD CHANDRAN & ASHOK MENON, JJ.----------------------------------W.A. Nos.1053, 1054 & 1062 of 2007----------------------------------Dated this the 5[th] day of March, 2018 JUDGMENT K. Vinod Chandran, J. The learned Counsel for the appellant submits thatthe entire payments to the Income Tax Department havebeen settled with respect to the demand of penaltyraised against the appellant's father, who is no more.In such circumstances, the appeals are said to beinfructuous. Hence, the above appeals are dismissed as infructuous. Sd/- K. VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE. Sd/- ASHOK MENON, JUDGE. sp/06/03/18 //True Copy//P.A. To Judge
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan