Wa/1075/2018 Of M/S Habitat Shelters Private Limited v. The Pr Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
01 Oct 2018 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Wa/1075/2018 Of M/S Habitat Shelters Private Limited v. The Pr Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
01 Oct 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Wa/1075/2018 Of M/S Habitat Shelters Private Limited v. The Pr Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: CHAUHAN J,DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT since the order dated 28.08.2018, has not been|complied with despite the fact that sufficient time has|been given for the learned counsel for the appellant for|complying with the office objections, the appeal stands|dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THR HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BBNGALURU|DATBD THIS THR 1 DAY OF OCTOBER 2018
PRESENT
THERE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAGHVENDRA S. CHAUHA
ANIL
THR HON’BLE MR. JUSTICBK B.M. SHYAM PRASAD
WRIT APPEAL NO.1075 OF 2018(TRES)
BETWEEN
M/S HABITAT SHELTERS PRIVATE LIMITEDA COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE COMPANIESACT, 1956, AND HAVING ITS CORPORATE OFFICE AT|UNIT NO.8, WEST GATE POINT R.V. ROADNO.77, BASAVANGUDI - 560 O04RBEPRBESEBENTBD BY [TS DIRBKMR. SUNIL R. BAdJ AJ... APPELLANT
(BY SRI. ANIRUDHA R.J. NAYAK, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.|THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXBANGALORE —- 3, BANGALORE.BANGALORE —- 3, BANGALORE.
D2 THE ADDITIONAL CITRANGE - 3(1) BANGALORE.RANGE - 3(1) BANGALORE.
3.|THE INCOME TAX OFFICERWARD 3(1)(3), 2 FLOOR,BMTC BUILDING|80 FEET ROAD, |KORAMANAGALABANGALORE - 560 O9O5.... RESPONDENTS|
THIS WRIT APPBKRPAL FILED UNDER SBKCTION 4 OF TKARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO: ALLOW THE WRIT|
PETITION, SETTING ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED BY THE!LHARNED)SINGLE|JUDGEINW.P.2009 /2018,DATHD12.02.2018, DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITIONS AND ISSUE A)WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI, OR MANDAMUS OR ANY|OTHER WRIT, ORDER OR DIRECTION AS THIS HON'BLE COURT|MAY DEEM FIT AND PROPER, QUASHING THE ORDER IN F.NO.AABCH2047N/Sp.Audit /ITO/W-3(1)(3)/2017-18DATED19.12.2017 AND 28.12.2017 AS BBING CONTRARY TO THE!PROVISIONS OF SECTION 142(2A) OF THE INCOME TAX ACT,|1961 AND BBING VIOLATIVE OF THE PRINCIPLES OF NATURAL|JUSTICE AND UNTBNABLE IN LAW.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDER THIS DAY,RAGHVENDRA S. CHAUHAN J,DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
since the order dated 28.08.2018, has not been|complied with despite the fact that sufficient time has|been given for the learned counsel for the appellant for|complying with the office objections, the appeal stands|dismissed.
SD/-JUDGE
SD/[JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.