Wa/1202/2020 Of Rajesh Mathew And Company v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
14 Sep 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wa/1202/2020 Of Rajesh Mathew And Company v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
14 Sep 2020
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wa/1202/2020 Of Rajesh Mathew And Company v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.
Decision: Accordingly, the Writ Appeal is disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAVI
MONDAY, THE 14TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2020 / 23RD BHADRA, 1942
WA.No.1202 OF 2020
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 8279/2020(H) OF HIGH COURTOF KERALA
APPELLANT/PETITIONER IN W.P.(C)NO.8279/2020:
RAJESH MATHEW AND COMPANY,CHERUMATTATHIL BUILDING, POST OFFICE JUNCTION, MUVATTUPUZHA ARAKUZHA ROAD, ERNAKULAM – 686661, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER, RAJESH MATHEW, S/O ISSAC MATHEW
BY ADV. SRI.PHILIP J.VETTICKATTU
RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS IN W.P.(C)NO.8279/2020:
1THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CIRCLE 1, ALUVA – 683101
2THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(APPEALS), PANAMPILLY NAGAR, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI – 682 036
SRI.CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM, STANDING COUNSEL, IT
THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON14.09.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 14[th] day of September, 2020
K.VINOD CHANDRAN, J.
Thegrievanceoftheappellant/writpetitioner is against the judgment which directedconsideration of the stay application withinthree months. The judgment is dated 17.03.2020,but was issued only on 03.06.2020, despite anapplication having been made on 18.03.2020. Asof now three months have elapsed. There is noconsideration of the stay petition till date.The appeal has not been disposed of and the stayapplication has also not been taken up since theappellate authority has not convened for reasonof the COVID-19 situation.
In the present circumstances, we are of theopinion that if at all the appellate authorityconvenes a hearing, the appeal itself can bedisposed of finally. In such circumstances,
leaving the discretion to the appellate authorityto hear the appeal expeditiously, we dispose ofthe Writ Appeal, directing that no recovery shallbe effected till the appeal is disposed of. Theappellant shall co-operate with the expeditiousdisposal of the appeal, if the appellate
authority proceeds to do so.
Accordingly, the Writ Appeal is disposed of.
Sd/-K.VINOD CHANDRANJUDGE
DM
Sd/-T.R.RAVIJUDGE
//TRUE COPY//
PA TO JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.