Wa/1218/2024 Of Smt Rehana Parveen v. The Income Tax Officer Ward 6(3)(1)
High Court
14 Oct 2024 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Wa/1218/2024 Of Smt Rehana Parveen v. The Income Tax Officer Ward 6(3)(1)
Date of order
14 Oct 2024
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Wa/1218/2024 Of Smt Rehana Parveen v. The Income Tax Officer Ward 6(3)(1), the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. | JS/-—List No.: 1 S| No.: 23] Sd/-|(V KAMESWAR RAO).JUDGE| Sd/-|(S RACHAIARH)JUDGE|
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Digitallysigned byNARAYANAUMALocation:HIGH COURTOFKARNATAKA
NC: 2024:KHC:41371-DBWA No. 1218 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURUDATED THIS THE 14 DAY OF OCTOBER, 2024
PRESENT|
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V KAMESWAR RAO
AND
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S RACHAIAH |.WRIT APPEAL NO. 1218 OF 2024 (TIT)
BETWEEN:
SMT REHANA PARVEEN.D/O YUSUF KHANAGED ABOUT 50 YEARSNO.: 53/1, GOUSE PEER MANZIL3[aD]MAIN, GANGANAGAR EXTENSION ~BANGALORE - 560 O32.PRESENTLY AT:NO.501, VISHWAS ALOEVERA APARTMENTALVARES ROAD, KADRIMANGALORE - 5/75 OO2.PAN No.:
APPELLANT.
(BY SRI. BALRAM R RAO, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.THE INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 6(3)(1)BMTC BUILDING, 80 FEET ROAD! BLOCK, NEAR KHB GAMES VILLAGEKORAMANGALA BENGALURU - 560 O95.2D.ADDITIONAL / JOINT / DEPUTY / ASSISTANT.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXNATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTRE.INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, DELHIII FLOOR, E-RAMP ~JAWAHARLAL NEHRU STADIUM |DELHI - 110 QO3.|
RESPONDENTS|
THIS WRIT APPEAL FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA.HIGH COURT ACT, 1961 PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE.AFORESAID CLAUSE IN THE ORDER DATED 04/07/2024 IN WP.NO.14246/2024 (TAX-IT) PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE|JUDGE AND TO ALLOW THIS WRIT APPEAL.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING,THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V KAMESWAR RAOand |
HON BLE MR JUSTICE S RACHAIAH
ORAL JUDGMENT(PER: HON BLE MR JUSTICE V KAMESWAR RAO)
After making some submissions, learned counsel for the.
appellants seeks to withdraw the appeal.
The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. |
JS/-—List No.: 1 S| No.: 23]
Sd/-|(V KAMESWAR RAO).JUDGE|
Sd/-|(S RACHAIARH)JUDGE|
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue