Case LawHigh Court › Wa/1398/2021 Of Holy Cross Forane Church...

Wa/1398/2021 Of Holy Cross Forane Church Cherpunkal v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 29 Oct 2021 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wa/1398/2021 Of Holy Cross Forane Church Cherpunkal v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
29 Oct 2021
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Wa/1398/2021 Of Holy Cross Forane Church Cherpunkal v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: The appeal fails and is dismissed, however leaving open allcontentions to be raised before the appropriate authority. jjj Sd/- S.V.BHATTI JUDGESd/- BASANT BALAJIJUDGE

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BASANT BALAJIFRIDAY, THE 29 DAY OF OCTOBER 2021 / 7TH KARTHIKA, 1943 WA NO. 1398 OF 2021 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 19557/2021 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM APPELLANT/S: HOLY CROSS FORANE CHURCH CHERPUNKALCHERPUNKAL.P.O, KOTTAYAM-686584, REPRESENTED BY ITS TRUSTEE MR.THOMAS MATHEW ARAMPULICKAL. BY ADVS.A.KUMARP.J.ANILKUMARG.MINI(1748)P.S.SREE PRASADJOB ABRAHAMAJAY V.ANAND RESPONDENT/S: 1PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXPUBLIC LIBRARY BUILDING,LAL BAHADUR SASTRI ROAD, KOTTAYAM-686001. 2NATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTRE, NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI-110001, REPRESENTED BY PRINCIPAL CHIEF COMMISSIONER. 3ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER, NATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTRE, NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI-110001. W.A. No.1398/2021 -2- OTHER PRESENT: SC JOSE JOSEPH THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29.10.2021, THECOURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.A. No.1398/2021 S.V.Bhatti, J. J U D G M E N T The writ petitioner is the appellant. The petitioner laidchallenge on Exts.P9 to P11 orders dated 12.08.2021. As per thescheme of the Income Tax Act, the petitioner has effective remedyof appeal under Section 246A of the Income Tax Act. The learnedJudge for available reasons and grounds declined to exercise thediscretionary jurisdiction. We are in agreement with the view of thelearned Single Judge. The appeal fails and is dismissed, however leaving open allcontentions to be raised before the appropriate authority. jjj Sd/- S.V.BHATTI JUDGESd/- BASANT BALAJIJUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan