Wa/1793/2019 Of Mrs Kanchan Agarwal v. The Income Tax Officer
High Court
29 Oct 2021 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Wa/1793/2019 Of Mrs Kanchan Agarwal v. The Income Tax Officer
Date of order
29 Oct 2021
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Wa/1793/2019 Of Mrs Kanchan Agarwal v. The Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE J9OTH DAY OF OCTOBER 2071
PRESENT|
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE
AND|
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE S. VISHWAJITH SHETTY
BETWEEN:
,W.A. NO.1793 OF 2019 (TIT)IN,W.P.NO.2456 OF 2019 (TIT)
MRS. KANCHAN AGARWAL|W/O MR. NATWAR AGARWAL|AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS|R/AT LAXMI ROADSTH CROSS, SHANTI NAGARBANGALORE-560 0O2/7
(BY MR. HARISH V.S. ADV.,)
... APPELLAN|
AND*
THE INCOME TAX OFFICER|WARD 7 (2) (2)3RD FLOOR ROOM NO, 327BMTC BUILDINGKORAMANGALA 80 FEET ROAD|BANGALORE-560 O95.
.., RESPONDENT
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA.HIGH COURT ACT, PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE RECORDS IN.W.P.No.2456/2019 (T-IT), PERUSE THE SAME AND SET ASIDETHAT PART OF THE JUDGMENT RESTORING THE PROCEEDINGS TO.
THE FILE OF THE RESPONDENT TO REDO THE ASSESSMENT|CONSIDERING THE PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS FILED BY THE.APPELLANT AND CONCLUDE THE ASSESSMENT THEREAFTER IN.ACCORDANCE WITH LAW WITHIN A PERIOD OF EIGHT WEEKSFROM THE DATE OF RECEIPT OF THE CERTIFIED COPY OF THE.ORDER AND ALLOW THE ABOVE APPEAL, IN THE INTEREST OFEQUITY AND JUSTICE.
THIS|WA.COMINGON.FOR.ORDERS,THISDAY,ALOK ARADHE J.,DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: |
JUDGMENT
Mr.Harish V.S., learned counsel for the appellant has|filed a memo seeking leave of this Court to withdraw theappeal on the ground that the dispute between the parties|has been amicably resolved under Vivad se Vishwas scheme.
The aforesaid memo is taken on record.
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/-—JUDGESd/-JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.