Wa/1868/2014 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax (Tds) v. Dr.sam Mohanraj Arthur
High Court
20 Jul 2016 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wa/1868/2014 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax (Tds) v. Dr.sam Mohanraj Arthur
Date of order
20 Jul 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Wa/1868/2014 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax (Tds) v. Dr.sam Mohanraj Arthur, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC &THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU
WEDNESDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF JULY 2016/29TH ASHADHA, 1938
WA.No. 1868 of 2014 ()
------------------------------
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C).NO.13470/2014 DATED 03-06-2014.........
APPELLANT/4TH RESPONDENT:
------------------------------------------------
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS),OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KOCHI, C.R. BUILDINGS, IS PRESS ROAD, KOCHI-682 018.
BY SRI.P.K.R.MENON, SENIOR SC,
ADV. SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC.
RESPONDENTS/PETITIONERS/RESPONDENTS 1 TO 3:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1.
DR.SAM MOHANRAJ ARTHUR, AGED 65 YEARS, S/O LATE SAM ARTHUR, BABY LAND, GIRI NAGAR, KOCHI-20, NOW RESIDING AT 206 ACADEMY COURT, 566, LONG BRIDGE ROAD, ESSEX UNITED KINGDOM-REPRESENTED BY HIS POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER MRS. PRESCILLA SUSHIL BABU, W/O DR. SUNDARLAL BABU SERENA, WATER FRONT ENCLAVE, CHILAVANNOOR ROAD, KOCHI-20.
2.
THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, COLLECTORATE, CIVIL STATION, KAKKANAD, ERNAKULAM-682 030.
3.THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (LAND ACQUISITION),KOCHI PROJECT, CIVIL STATION, KAKKANAD-682 030.
4. KOCHI METRO RAIL CORPORATION, BY MANAGING DIRECTOR, VYTTILA, ERNAKULAM-682 019.
R1 BY ADV. SMT.K.S.SANTHI. R2& R3 BY GOVT. PLEADER SMT.SOBHA ANNAMMA EAPEN. R4 BY ADV. SMT.M.U.VIJAYALAKSHMI, SC.
rs.
THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20-07-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
ANTONY DOMINIC&DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU, JJ.
--------------------------------------------------
W.A. No. 1868 of 2014--------------------------------------------------
Dated this the 20[th] day of July, 2016
J U D G M E N T
Antony Dominic, J.
Despite various opportunities granted and though itwas made clear in the order dated 13.07.2016 that timegranted for curing the defect was as a last chance,defects still remain uncured. Therefore, the appeal isdismissed for non prosecution.
Sd/-ANTONY DOMINICJUDGE
Sd/-DAMA SESHADRI NAIDUJUDGE
bka/-
//True copy//PA to Judge
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.