Wa/1929/2016 Of Mrs.p.v.mercy v. The Income Tax Officer

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN THURSDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2016/7TH ASWINA, 1938 WA.No. 1929 of 2016 IN WP(C).27503/2016 ------------------------------------------ AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 27503/2016 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 30-08-2016 APPELLANT/PETITIONER IN WPC: ----------------------------- P.V.MERCY PROPRIETOR, M/S. AISWARYA TRADERS, NHAMANGAD P.O., VYLATHUR, THRISSUR-680307. BY ADVS.SRI.K.SRIKUMAR (SR.) SRI.K.MANOJ CHANDRAN SRI.P.R.AJITHKUMAR SRI.S.A.MANSOOR (PATTANAM) RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS IN WPC: -------------------------------- 1. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER DEPARTMENT OF INCOME TAXES, WARD-1, GURUVAYOOR. 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) 3RD FLOOR, AAYAKAR BHAVAN, THRISSUR-680001. 3RD FLOOR, AAYAKAR BHAVAN, THRISSUR-680001. BY SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29-09-2016, THECOURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ami/ THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & ANU SIVARAMAN, JJ. ----------------------------------------------- W.A.No.1929 of 2016 -----------------------------------------------Dated this the 29[th] day of September, 2016 J U D G M E N T Thottathil B.Radhakrishnan, J. We have heard the learned counsel for the appellant quite inextenso. The learned single Judge has refused to interfere withExt.P4, fundamentally because it appears that Ext.P4 was aconsent order. Obviously therefore, nothing stands in the wayof the appellant/petitioner seeking leniency from the authoritywhich issued Ext.P4 even if she needs any modification orextension of time. Hence, without prejudice to that, this writappeal is dismissed. All pending interlocutory applications are closed. Sd/- THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN JUDGE ami/30.9.16 Sd/- ANU SIVARAMAN JUDGE //True copy// P.A.to Judge