Case LawHigh Court › Wa/327/2003 Of M/S.kamath Marbles v. Inc...

Wa/327/2003 Of M/S.kamath Marbles v. Income Tax Officer,Ward-I,Kannur

High Court 10 Jul 2007 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wa/327/2003 Of M/S.kamath Marbles v. Income Tax Officer,Ward-I,Kannur
Date of order
10 Jul 2007
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Wa/327/2003 Of M/S.kamath Marbles v. Income Tax Officer,Ward-I,Kannur, the High Court (2007) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Taking note of the submission made by the learned counsel, theWrit Appeal is disposed of, as having become infructuous.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.H.L.DATTU & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN TUESDAY, THE 10TH JULY 2007 / 19TH ASHADHA 1929 WA.No. 327 of 2003 AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN OP.15819/1997 Dated 20/12/2002 APPELLANT: PETITIONER --------------------- M/S.KAMATH MARBLES, ONDEN ROAD, KANNUR REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER SHRI.H.AJITH KUMAR KAMATH, AGED 34, S/O.H.CHITHARANJAN KAMATH. BY ADV. SRI.C.KOCHUNNY NAIR SRI.DALE P.KURIEN RESPONDENTS: RESPONDENTS ------------------------ 1. THE INCOME-TAX OFFICER, WARD - I, KANNUR. 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME - TAX (APPEALS), CALICUT. 3. UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO MINISTRY OF LAW. BY ADV. SRI.P.K.R.MENON(SR.) SRI.N.R.K.MENON THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10/07/2007, THE COURTON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: H.L.DATTU, C.J. & K.T.SANKARAN,J. ---------------------------------------------------- W.A. NO. 327 OF 2003 ---------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 10[th] July, 2007 JUDGMENT H.L.DATTU, C.J. Learned counsel, Sri.Dale P.Kurian, appearing for the appellantsubmits that as on today, the reliefs sought for by the appellant do notsurvive for consideration of this Court. 2. Taking note of the submission made by the learned counsel, theWrit Appeal is disposed of, as having become infructuous. 3. In view of the order passed in the Writ Appeal, the relief soughtfor in C.M.P.No.1042 of 2003 need not be considered by this Court.Accordingly, the said C.M.P is also rejected. Ordered accordingly. (H.L.DATTU)Chief Justice ahz/ (K.T.SANKARAN)Judge H.L.DATTU, C.J. &K.T.SANKARAN, J. --------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------- W.A.NO. 327 OF 2003 JUDGMENT 10[th] July, 2007 ---------------------------------------------
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan