Wa/328/2024 Of The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/A Ad2Pro Media Solutions Inc., Usa
High Court
24 Jun 2024 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Wa/328/2024 Of The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/A Ad2Pro Media Solutions Inc., Usa
Date of order
24 Jun 2024
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wa/328/2024 Of The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/A Ad2Pro Media Solutions Inc., Usa, the High Court (2024) decided the matter.
Decision: In view of the above, the appeal being unworthy of merits, is liable to be and accordingly rejected, costs having been made easy.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
Digitally signedby SHARADAVANI BLocation: HIGHCOURT OFKARNATAKA
NC: 2024:KHC:22918-DBWA No. 328 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 24 DAY OF JUNE, 2024
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNA S DIXIT
AND
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAMACHANDRA D. HUDDAR -WRIT APPEAL NO. 328 OF 2024 (TIT)
BETWEEN:
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION), CIRCLE-1(1), BMTC BUILDING, 80 FEET ROAD, KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU – 560 095.
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI. Y.V. RAVIRAJ., ADVOCATE)
AND:
M/S AD2PRO MEDIA SOLUTIONS INC.,USA, REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORISED SIGNATORY SRI. VENKATESAPERUAMAL GOPALAKISHNAN, SON OF LATE SRI. VENKATESAPERUMAL, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, NO.23371, MULHOLLAND DR.NO.132, WOODLAND HILLS, CA 91364 USA.
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI.V.CHANDRASHEKHAR, ADVOCATE)
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE IN W.P. No.4233/2021(T-IT) DATED 13.04.2023, ETC.
THIS WRIT APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, KRISHNA S DIXIT J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
The challenge is to the order of the learned Single Judge dated 13.04.2023 passed in Writ Petition No.4233/2021(T-IT), whereby a batch of petitions having been favoured, the assessees therein have been granted relief.
2. On perusal of the paper book, we notice that the learned Single Judge has followed the decision of a co-ordinate Bench of this Court in ITA No.232/2020 and connected matters. We do not find any error in the learned Single Judge's order, applying the ratio of the said decision to the subject petition and granting the relief to the assessees.
In view of the above, the appeal being unworthy of
merits, is liable to be and accordingly rejected, costs having been made easy.
Sd/- JUDGE
Sd/- JUDGE
BMV* List No.: 1 Sl No.: 8
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.