Case Law › High Court › Wa/3638/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Inco...

Wa/3638/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Tds v. M/S Kingfisher Airlines Ltd

High Court 31 Jul 2012 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · karnataka_bng_old

Parties

Date of order

31 Jul 2012

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Wa/3638/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Tds v. M/S Kingfisher Airlines Ltd, the High Court (2012) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Accordingly, Writ Appeals are dismissed. od/-JUDGE 7&1H sd/-JUDGE

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BANGALORE DATED THIS THER 3 DAY OF JULY, 2012) PRESENT THER HON BLE MR. JUSTICE K.SREEBEDHAR ANT THR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B. MANOHAR W.A. Nos.3638;3640/2012 (T;IT) BBRITIWE 1.The Commissioner of Income Tax-TDS,HMT Bhavan,Bellary Road,HMT Bhavan,Bellary Road, Bangalore. ooThe Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax-TDS,Circle —16(2),HMT Bhavan,Bellary Road,Bangalore.Circle —16(2),HMT Bhavan,Bellary Road,Bangalore. Appellants (By Sri M.V. Seshachala, Sr. Adv. for K.V. Aravind, Advs.) AND: 1.M/s. Kingtisher Airlines Ltd.. Registered Officer at UB Towers,Level 12,UB City, No.24,Vittal Mallya Road,Bangalore — 560 OO1,Rep. by Mr. T.R. Venkatadri,Assistant Vice President (Taxation). 2.M/s. International Air Transport Association,No.101, HDO Corporate Enclave,BD Swanth Marg, Chakala,Andheri West,Mumbai — 400 099| 3.M/s. American Express Banking Corporation,“Cyber City’”Tower-C, DLF Building,No.8, Sector-209DLF City, Gurgaon,Haryana — 122 022,Rep. by its General Manager. 4 state Bank of India,Industrial Finance Branch,No.61, “Residency Plaza’,Residency Road,Bangalore — 560 025,Rep. by its General Manager. 5.Axis Bank,Atlanta Nariman Point,Mumbai — 400 099,Rep. by its General Manager.6,BILL DESK,Indiaidias.com lmited,No.E-510, Crystal Plaza,New Link Road,Andheri (West),Mumbai — 400 053,Rep. by General Manager. (By Smt. S.R. Anuradha, Advocate) Respondents These W.As. are filed U/s.4 of the Karnataka HighCourt Act praying to set aside the order passed in the WritPetition No.21549 and 21613-614/2012 dated 27/06/2012and 05/07/2012, These appeals are coming for orders on this day,SREEDHAR RAO, J.,delivered the following: JU DBGMENT The counsel for the appellants submits that the WritAppeal may be dismissed as not pressed in view of the factthat the interim order granted was limited in point of timeand that it has expired. There is no further extension ofinterim order. Accordingly, Writ Appeals are dismissed. od/-JUDGE 7&1H sd/-JUDGE

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.