Wa/4298/2013 Of Suryanarayana Devaraj Pande v. The Income Tax Officer Ward 8(3)
High Court
14 Feb 2014 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Wa/4298/2013 Of Suryanarayana Devaraj Pande v. The Income Tax Officer Ward 8(3)
Date of order
14 Feb 2014
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Wa/4298/2013 Of Suryanarayana Devaraj Pande v. The Income Tax Officer Ward 8(3), the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: If the office objections are not complied, | the appeal shall stand dismissed for non-prosecution| without reference to the Court. od/sd/-JUDGE.T By: AMB.C By: N]R By:AMBCOPYod/-|ASSISTANT REGISTRAR JUDGE
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALOREDATED THIS THE 14[th]DAY QF FEBRUARY 2014
PRESENT|
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE|
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B. MAHOHAR|
WRIT APPEAL No. 4298/2013 (T-IT)
BETWEEN:
suryanarayana Devaraj Pande,PAN: ABLPP/O2Z4RAge: 93 years,|Occupation: Business,Address: No. 605,Pushpanjali, 2[nd]C Cross, 7[ %]Main,3[rd]stage, 3[rd]Block,Basaveshwarnagar,
Bangalore — 560 O79. |
_ APPBLLANT
(By Sri./Smt: BALRAM R. RAO, Advocate).
AND:
4#The Income Tax Officer Ward 8(3),Jeevan Sampige,No.1/1, Sampige Road,Bangalore — 560 O03.
2.The Additional Commissioner ot|Income Tax, Range 8, Income Tax, Range 8,
D2
Jeevan Sampige,No.1/1, Sampige Road,Bangalore — 560 O03.
3.The Commissioner of Income Tax,(Appeals) —V, Bangalore|R.No. 314, 3[rd]Floor, HMT Bhavan,09 Bellary Road,Ganganagar,Bangalore — 560 032.
4The Commissioner of Income Tax IV,Bangalore,R.No. A-123,Central Revenue Building,|No.1, Queens Road,Bangalore — 560 OO1.
.. RESPONDENTS
This Writ Appeal is filed U/S 4 of the Karnataka High|Court Act praying to set aside the order passed in the Writ)Petition No.16909/2013 (T-IT) dated 22-4-2013.
This Writ Appeal coming on for orders this day the court|made the following order.
ORDER
Two weeks time, at the request of learned counsel for|the appellant is granted, by way of last chance to comply.office objections. If the office objections are not complied,
|
the appeal shall stand dismissed for non-prosecution|
without reference to the Court.
od/sd/-JUDGE.T By: AMB.C By: N]R By:AMBCOPYod/-|ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.