Case LawHigh Court › Wa/6043/2015 Of Corporation Bank v. The...

Wa/6043/2015 Of Corporation Bank v. The Income Tax Officer (Tds)

High Court 14 Mar 2016 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · karhcdharwad
Parties
Wa/6043/2015 Of Corporation Bank v. The Income Tax Officer (Tds)
Date of order
14 Mar 2016
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Wa/6043/2015 Of Corporation Bank v. The Income Tax Officer (Tds), the High Court (2016) decided the matter.

Decision: Tne appeals stand disposed of in the above terms. !.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKADHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 14 DAY OF MARCH 2016PRESENT THE HON’'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.G.RAMES THE HON’‘BLE MR. JUSTICE G.NARENDA ""WA. Nos. 6043)6046 of 2015 (TIT) BETWEEN ° CORPORATION BANKREPRESENTED BY CHIEF MANAGER NEHRU NAGAR BRANCH1357/A, PAI COMPLEX,OPP. HOTEL RAMDEV,NEHRU NAGAR, BELAGAVI-S90010. APPELLAN[ (BY SRIYUTHS B. S. N. PRASAD AND H.R. KAMBIYAVAR,ADVOCATES) AND : 1.THE INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS)F.K.COMMERCIAL COMPLEXOPP, DISTRICT HOSPITALDR.B.R.AMBEDKAR ROAD,BELAGAVI-590001F.K.COMMERCIAL COMPLEXOPP, DISTRICT HOSPITALDR.B.R.AMBEDKAR ROAD,BELAGAVI-590001 2.THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)F.K.COMMERCIAL COMPLEXOPP. CIVIL HOSPITALDR.B.R.AMBEDKAR ROAD,BELAGAVI-590001.F.K.COMMERCIAL COMPLEXOPP. CIVIL HOSPITALDR.B.R.AMBEDKAR ROAD,BELAGAVI-590001. RESPONDENTS (BY SRI Y.V. RAVIRAJ, ADVOCATE) THESE WRIT APPEALS ARE FILED U/S 4 OF THEKARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THEORDER PASSED IN THE WRIT PETITION NOS.11439/7-114400 O2015 DATED 18/12/15. I.A. NO.2/2015 IS FILED FOR STAY. THESE W.As. A/W. I.A. COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARYHEARING THIS DAY,|H.G. RAMESH J., DELIVERED IHEFOLLOWING: JUDGMENT H.G.RAMESH, J. (Oral)' 1.It is submitted by the learned counsel on potn sidesthat these appeals are similar to the appeals in W.A.Nos.6035-6038 of 2015, which are disposed of today. Theysubmit that these appeals may also be disposed of in theSame terms. 2.In view of the above, we make the following order: The impugned order of the learned Single Judge dated18.12.2015 in W.P. Nos.114397-114400 of 2015, and, theorder of the First Appellate Authority dated 16.04.2015rejecting the appellant’s application filed for interim stay,are set aside. The matter is remitted to the AppellateAuthority, namely the Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals), for reconsideration in accordance with law. The Appellate Authority snaliInter alla.consider as to wnetnerthe first proviso to Section 201(1) of the Income Tax Act,1961 is applicable to the facts of the case or not. Allcontentions of botn the parties are kept open. Tne appeals stand disposed of in the above terms. !. In view of disposal of the appeals, I.A. No.2/2015filed for interim stay does not survive for consideration; itstands disposed of accordingly. Appeals disposed of. Sd/-JUDGE Sd/-JUDGE 6:2
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan