Case LawHigh Court › Wa/6868/2017 Of M/S Deepak Extrusions Pv...

Wa/6868/2017 Of M/S Deepak Extrusions Pvt. Ltd v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 26 Jun 2023 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Wa/6868/2017 Of M/S Deepak Extrusions Pvt. Ltd v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
26 Jun 2023
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Wa/6868/2017 Of M/S Deepak Extrusions Pvt. Ltd v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2023) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: In the circumstance, this appeal stands dismissed for non-prosecution.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

Digitally signed byANUSHA VLocation: HIGHCOURT OFKARNATAKA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 26 DAY OF JUNE, 2023 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE P.S.DINESH KUMAR AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE T.G. SHIVASHANKARE GOWDA -WRIT APPEAL NO. 6868 OF 2017 (TIT) BETWEEN: M/s. DEEPAK EXTRUSIONS PVT. LTD., A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956 HAVING ITS OFFICE AT: NO.187/780, YERANDHALLI VILLAGE JIGANI HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK BEHIND BOMMASANDRA, INDUSTRIAL AREA BANGALORE-560 058 REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR MR. DEEPAK BETHALA S/O PRAKASH BETHALA AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS …APPELLANT (BY SHRI. V.S. HARISH, ADVOCATE – ) AND: THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(4) CENTRAL REVENUE BUILDING QUEENS ROAD BANGALORE-560 001 …RESPONDENT THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER OF THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE DATED 05.09.2017 IN WP NO.33124/2017 (T-IT) AND ALLOW THE SAME AS PRAYED FOR. THIS WRIT APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, P.S.DINESH KUMAR, J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT This appeal is of the year 2017. None appeared on 29.05.2023, 12.06.2023 as also today. Cost imposed on the appellant is also not been paid. Appellant does not seem to be interested in prosecuting this appeal. In the circumstance, this appeal stands dismissed for non-prosecution. 2. In view disposal of this appeal, pending interlocutory applications, if any, do not survive for consideration and they stand disposed of. No costs. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- JUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan