Wa/900/2020 Of The Aloor Service Co Operative Bank Ltd.693 v. The Income Tax Officer
High Court
18 Oct 2022 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wa/900/2020 Of The Aloor Service Co Operative Bank Ltd.693 v. The Income Tax Officer
Date of order
18 Oct 2022
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Wa/900/2020 Of The Aloor Service Co Operative Bank Ltd.693 v. The Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2022) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Writ Appeal is disposed of as indicated above.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI
&
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BASANT BALAJI
TUESDAY, THE 18 DAY OF OCTOBER 2022 / 26TH ASWINA, 1944
WA NO. 900 OF 2020
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 8822/2020 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA
APPELLANT:
THE ALOOR SERVICE CO OPERATIVE BANK LTD.693, SAHAKARANA MANDIRAM, MALA VIA, ALOOR, THRISSUR-680 683, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARYBY ADV P.C.SASIDHARAN
RESPONDENTS:
1THE INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 2 (4),THRISSUR, OFFICE OF THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, SHAK-THANTHAMPURAN NAGAR, THRISSUR-680 001 WARD 2 (4),THRISSUR, OFFICE OF THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, SHAK-THANTHAMPURAN NAGAR, THRISSUR-680 001
2THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS), AAYAKAR BHAVAN, S.T. NAGAR, THRISSUR-680 001 AAYAKAR BHAVAN, S.T. NAGAR, THRISSUR-680 001
3THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, COCHIN BENCH, ERNKAULAM COCHIN BENCH, ERNKAULAM
BY ADVS. SRI.P.K.RAVINDRANATHA MENON (SR.) SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX
THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18.10.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
The writ petitioner is the appellant. The appellant filed the writ petition for the following prayers:
(i)To issue a writ of certiorari, or other appropriate writ, order, or direction to quash Exhibit P11 to P14.
(ii)To declare that the procedure adopted by the Recovery Officer to recover the tax is highly arbitrary, illegal and violative of the statutory mandate contained in Section 236(3) of the Income Tax Act.
(iii)Issue a writ of mandamus or other appropriate writ order or direction directing the respondents to return the amounts collected through Exts.P7 to P10.
(iv)To declare that the encashment of the amounts towards tax collection is highly arbitrary and illegal
(v) to issue such other writ, order or direction as this Honourable Court may deem fit and proper in the case.
2. The subject matter of the writ petition relates to the
disputes between the appellant and the respondents herein concerning the income tax returns filed by the appellant for the assessment years 2012-13, 2016-17 and 2017-18. The appellant filed
tax appeal before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal aggrieved by the order of assessment and appellate order of the Commissioner of
Income Tax (Appeals), Thrissur. The appellant filed W.P(C) No.8822 of 2020 before this Court and the learned Single Judge directed to refund 70% of the amounts recovered to the Society and retain 30% with the Department.
3. During the pendency of the appeal, it is stated by the learned counsel Mr. P.C Sasidharan appearing for the appellant that the appeal filed by the appellant before the Tribunal is allowed in favour of the appellant/assessee and the deduction available under Section 80P of the Income Tax Act has been extended.
4. The cause in the appeal does not survive in view of the final adjudication of the tax appeal filed by the appellant before the Tribunal. Therefore, the amount recovered/ received as tax dues by the Department is refunded to the appellant/assessee, since the claim of the assessee is accepted by the Tribunal.
5. We place on record the subsequent developments taking place in the matter and dispose of the appeal by directing the jurisdictional Assessing Officer/respondents, to refund the amount recovered/received as tax dues from the appellant. The appellant is
given liberty to represent for refund of the tax amount by enclosing a copy of the judgment and orders are passed in accordance with law on refund and eligible interest in this behalf.
Writ Appeal is disposed of as indicated above.
S.V.BHATTIJUDGE
BASANT BALAJIJUDGE
JS
WA NO. 900 OF 2020
-5-
APPENDIX OF WA 900/2020
APPELLANT’S ANNEXURESANNEXURE-A1TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN W.A.NO.2488 OF 2019 DATED 20.01.2020
PETITIONER ANNEXURES
Annexure A1 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DATED 06.10.2020 ANNEXURE A2: True copy of the statement.
given liberty to represent for refund of the tax amount by enclosing a copy of the judgment and orders are passed in accordance with law on refund and eligible interest in this behalf.
Writ Appeal is disposed of as indicated above.
S.V.BHATTIJUDGE
BASANT BALAJIJUDGE
JS
WA NO. 900 OF 2020
-5-
APPENDIX OF WA 900/2020
APPELLANT’S ANNEXURESANNEXURE-A1TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN W.A.NO.2488 OF 2019 DATED 20.01.2020
PETITIONER ANNEXURES
Annexure A1 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DATED 06.10.2020 ANNEXURE A2: True copy of the statement.
RESPONDENT ANNEXURES
ANNEXURE A: True copy of the Panchnama prepared on 13.3.2020. ANNEXURE B: True copy of the minutes of the meeting Held on 16.03.2020.
PETITIONER ANNEXURES
ANNEXURE A1: True copy of the communication dated 21/07/2020.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.