Case LawHigh Court › Wa/959/2007 Of M/S.vaigai Thread Process...

Wa/959/2007 Of M/S.vaigai Thread Processors Ltd v. Agrl.income Tax & Sales Tax Officer

High Court 10 Apr 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wa/959/2007 Of M/S.vaigai Thread Processors Ltd v. Agrl.income Tax & Sales Tax Officer
Date of order
10 Apr 2007
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Wa/959/2007 Of M/S.vaigai Thread Processors Ltd v. Agrl.income Tax & Sales Tax Officer, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.

Decision: The writ appeal is disposed of as above.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR.K.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.N.KRISHNAN TUESDAY, THE 10TH APRIL 2007 / 20TH CHAITHRA 1929 WA.No. 959 of 2007() ----------------------------- (AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 29/03/2007 IN WP(C) NO.10576 OF 2007 OF THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE) APPELLANT: PETITIONER: --------------------------------------- M/S.VAIGAI THREAD PROCESSORS LTD., KORATTY, CHALAKKUDY, REPRESENTED BY ITS WHOLETIME DIRECTOR, MR.V.J.PAUL. BY ADV. SRI.A.M.SHAFFIQUE SRI.E.K.NANDAKUMAR SRI.JAYASANKAR A.K. SRI.ANIL D.NAIR RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. AGRICULTURAL INCOME TAX & SALES TAX OFFICER, THRISSUR. 2. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES, (APPEALS), ERNAKULAM. 3. INSPECTING ASST.COMMISSIONER, OF COMMERCIAL TAXES, MINI CIVIL STATION, IRINJALAKUDA. 4. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY (TAXATION), SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY SPL.GOVERNMENT PLEADER (TAXES) SRI. V.V. ASOKAN THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10/04/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN, AG.C.J. & M.N. KRISHNAN,J. = = = = = == = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = W.A. NO. 959 OF 2007 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 10[th] day of April, 2007. J U D G M E N T Radhakrishnan, Ag.C.J. This writ appeal is filed against W.P.C.10576 of2007. The learned Single Judge disposed of the writ petitionstating that the direction of the Appellate Authority to payone-third of the balance tax is only reasonable. We find noerror in the finding of the learned Single Judge. However, timefor payment of amount is extended by one month from today. The writ appeal is disposed of as above. K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE. ul/- M.N. KRISHNAN, JUDGE.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan