Wallfort Share & Stock Brokers Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai v. Assistant Commisisoner Of Income Tax -4(2), Mumbai
High Court
26 Apr 2011 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Wallfort Share & Stock Brokers Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai v. Assistant Commisisoner Of Income Tax -4(2), Mumbai
Date of order
26 Apr 2011
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wallfort Share & Stock Brokers Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai v. Assistant Commisisoner Of Income Tax -4(2), Mumbai, the High Court (2011) decided the matter.
Decision: 4.Accordingly, the appeal is disposed of by answering the question in favour of the assessee and against the revenue with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
1
itxal2419.10.sxw
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 2419 OF 2010
Wallfort Share & Stock Brokers Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai
Vs.
Assistant Commisisoner of Income Tax -4(2), Mumbai
..Appellant
.. Respondent
Mr.Atul K. Jasani for the Appellant.
Mrs. Anamika Malhotra for the Respondent.
CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND A.A. SAYED, JJ.
DATE : 26TH APRIL, 2011.
P.C.
1.Heard.
2.Objections waived. Office to number the appeal. The appeal is admitted on the following question of law:
Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law
depreciation under section 32 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is allowable on the BSE membership card acquired by the Appellant after 1st April, 1998?
answered in favour of assessee and against the revenue by the decision of
the Apex Court in the case of Techno Shares and Stocks Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income -Tax, reported in (2010) 327 ITR 323 (SC).
4.Accordingly, the appeal is disposed of by answering the question in favour of the assessee and against the revenue with no order as to costs.
( A.A. SAYED, J. )
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.