Case LawHigh Court › While Assailing The Assessment Order Bef...

While Assailing The Assessment Order Before The 1[St]Respondent, Petitioner Has Sought To Canvass That Thejudgment Of The Supreme Court In Mavilayi Service Co-O v. Commissioner Of Income Tax[2021 (1) Klt 485] Now Governs The Field Thereby Renderingthe Assessment Itself As Incorrect

High Court 27 Oct 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
While Assailing The Assessment Order Before The 1[St]Respondent, Petitioner Has Sought To Canvass That Thejudgment Of The Supreme Court In Mavilayi Service Co-O v. Commissioner Of Income Tax[2021 (1) Klt 485] Now Governs The Field Thereby Renderingthe Assessment Itself As Incorrect
Date of order
27 Oct 2022
Assessment year(s)
2020-2021
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In While Assailing The Assessment Order Before The 1[St]Respondent, Petitioner Has Sought To Canvass That Thejudgment Of The Supreme Court In Mavilayi Service Co-O v. Commissioner Of Income Tax[2021 (1) Klt 485] Now Governs The Field Thereby Renderingthe Assessment Itself As Incorrect, the High Court (2022) decided the matter under Section 80P of the Income-tax Act.

Decision: The writ petition is disposed of as above. ajt sd/-GOPINATH P.JUDGE WP(C) NO.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P. THURSDAY, THE 27 DAY OF OCTOBER 2022 / 5TH KARTHIKA, 1944WP(C) NO. 34067 OF 2022 PETITIONER/S: THE NATTIKA SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD NO.R.308P.O.NATTIKA, THRISSUR - 680566, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY., PIN - 680566BY ADV P.C.SASIDHARAN RESPONDENT/S: 1THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)NATIONAL FACELESS APPEAL CENTRE, ROOM NO.356 C.R. BUILDING, IP ESTATE, DELHI- 110 002., PIN - 110002NATIONAL FACELESS APPEAL CENTRE, ROOM NO.356 C.R. BUILDING, IP ESTATE, DELHI- 110 002., PIN - 110002 2THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXO/O THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, AYAKAR BHAVAN, MANANCHIRA, KOZHIKODE, KERALA - 673001. , PIN -673001O/O THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, AYAKAR BHAVAN, MANANCHIRA, KOZHIKODE, KERALA - 673001. , PIN -673001 3THE INCOME TAX OFFICERWARD 1 & TPS, CITY PLAZA, INCOME TAX OFFICE, WEST NADA,GURUVAYOOR, KERALA - 680 101., PIN - 680101BY ADV JOSE JOSEPH, SC, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, KERALA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON27.10.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT Petitioner is a Primary Agricultural Credit Societyregistered under the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, 1969.Ext.P1 order of assessment was issued against the petitioneron 30.08.2022. In the assessment order, petitioner's claim fordeduction under Section 80P was rejected on the ground thatthere was no evidence to show that petitioner satisfied theingredients of the Primary Agricultural Credit Society ascontemplated under the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act. 2. While assailing the assessment order before the 1[st]respondent, petitioner has sought to canvass that thejudgment of the Supreme Court in Mavilayi Service Co-operative Bank Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax[2021 (1) KLT 485] now governs the field thereby renderingthe assessment itself as incorrect. 3. Since the petitioner has already preferred an appealas Ext.P3 and the same is pending consideration before the 1[st]respondent, I deem it fit that this writ petition be disposed of,directing the Appellate Authority to consider the appeal in atime bound manner. WP(C) NO. 34067 OF 2022 3 4. Accordingly, there will be a direction to the 1[st]respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P3as expeditiously as possible. 5. Till the disposal of the appeal, no coercive steps shallbe initiated against the petitioner pursuant to Ext.P3assessment order. The writ petition is disposed of as above. ajt sd/-GOPINATH P.JUDGE WP(C) NO. 34067 OF 2022 4 APPENDIX OF WP(C) 34067/2022 PETITIONER EXHIBITSExhibit P1 Exhibit P2 Exhibit P3 Exhibit P4 Exhibit P5 Exhibit P6 Exhibit P7Exhibit P8 EXHIBIT-P1: TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDERDATED 30/08/2022 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2020-2021 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT-P2: TRUE COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE DATED 30/08/2022 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT-P3: TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL DATED 29/9/2022 PREFERRED BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENTBY THE PETITIONER EXHIBIT-P4:TRUE COPY OF THE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF RECEIPT OF FORM SHOWING THE DATE OF FILINGAS 29/9/2022 EXHIBIT-P5: TRUE COPY OF THE STAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER DATED 29/9/2022 EXHIBIT-P6: TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 1/7/2019 IN W.A.1536 OF 2019 EXHIBIT P7:- TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN W.P(C) NO.22073/2021 DATED 13/10/2021EXHIBIT P8:- TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN W.P(C) NO. 24804/2021 DATED 11-11-2021
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan