While Assailing The Assessment Order Beforethe 1St Respondent, Petitioner Has Sought To Canvassthat The Judgment Of The Supreme Court In Mavilayiservice Coopera v. Commissionerof Income Tax [2021 (1) Klt 485] Was Notconsidered By The Assessing Officer Though Theassessment Order Was Rendered Subsequent To The
High Court
25 Oct 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
While Assailing The Assessment Order Beforethe 1St Respondent, Petitioner Has Sought To Canvassthat The Judgment Of The Supreme Court In Mavilayiservice Coopera v. Commissionerof Income Tax [2021 (1) Klt 485] Was Notconsidered By The Assessing Officer Though Theassessment Order Was Rendered Subsequent To The
Date of order
25 Oct 2022
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In While Assailing The Assessment Order Beforethe 1St Respondent, Petitioner Has Sought To Canvassthat The Judgment Of The Supreme Court In Mavilayiservice Coopera v. Commissionerof Income Tax [2021 (1) Klt 485] Was Notconsidered By The Assessing Officer Though Theassessment Order Was Rendered Subsequent To The, the High Court (2022) decided the matter under Section 80P of the Income-tax Act.
Decision: The writ petition is disposed of as above.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P.
TUESDAY, THE 25 DAY OF OCTOBER 2022 / 3RD KARTHIA, 1944
WP(C) NO. 33658 OF 2022
PETITIONER:
1THE PUNNAYUR PANCHAYAT SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD NO.P.584 P.O.EDAKKARA- AKALAD, THRISSUR - 680 506, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, PIN - 680506BY ADV P.C.SASIDHARAN
RESPONDENTS:
25.10.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 25[th] day of October, 2022
Petitioner is a Primary Agricultural Credit Societyregistered under the Kerala Co-operative SocietiesAct, 1969. Ext.P1 order of assessment was issuedagainst the petitioner on 02.08.2022. In theassessment order, petitioner's claim for deductionunder Section 80P was rejected on the ground thatthere was no evidence to show that petitionersatisfied the ingredients of the Primary AgriculturalCredit Society as contemplated under the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act.
2.While assailing the assessment order beforethe 1st respondent, petitioner has sought to canvassthat the judgment of the Supreme Court in MavilayiService Cooperative Bank Ltd. v. Commissionerof Income Tax [2021 (1) KLT 485] was notconsidered by the assessing officer though theassessment order was rendered subsequent to the
Supreme Court Judgment.
3.Since the petitioner has already preferred
an appeal as Ext.P3 and the same is pendingconsideration before the 1[st] respondent, I deem it fitthat this writ petition be disposed of directing theAppellate Authority to consider the appeal in a timebound manner.
4.
Accordingly, there will be a direction to the
1[st] respondent to consider and pass appropriateorders on Ext.P3, as expeditiously as possible.orders on Ext.P3, as expeditiously as possible.
5.
Till the disposal of the appeal, no coercive
steps shall be initiated against the petitioner pursuantto Ext.P1 assessment order.to Ext.P1 assessment order.
The writ petition is disposed of as above.
Sd/-
GOPINATH P.
JUDGE
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 33658/2022
TRUE COPY
P.A.TO JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.