While Assailing The Assessment Order Beforethe 3[Rd ]Respondent, Petitioner Has Sought To Canvassthat The Judgment Of The Supreme Court In Mavilayiservice Co-Op v. Commissionerof Income Tax; 2021 (1) Klt 485 Now Governs Thefield Thereby Rendering The Assessment Itself Asincorrect
High Court
17 Nov 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
While Assailing The Assessment Order Beforethe 3[Rd ]Respondent, Petitioner Has Sought To Canvassthat The Judgment Of The Supreme Court In Mavilayiservice Co-Op v. Commissionerof Income Tax; 2021 (1) Klt 485 Now Governs Thefield Thereby Rendering The Assessment Itself Asincorrect
Date of order
17 Nov 2022
Assessment year(s)
2020-2021
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In While Assailing The Assessment Order Beforethe 3[Rd ]Respondent, Petitioner Has Sought To Canvassthat The Judgment Of The Supreme Court In Mavilayiservice Co-Op v. Commissionerof Income Tax; 2021 (1) Klt 485 Now Governs Thefield Thereby Rendering The Assessment Itself Asincorrect, the High Court (2022) decided the matter under Section 80P of the Income-tax Act.
Decision: The writ petition is disposed of as above.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P.
THURSDAY, THE 17 DAY OF NOVEMBER 2022 / 26TH KARTHIKA, 1944
WP(C) NO. 36540 OF 2022
PETITIONER:
1THE MULLASSERY SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD NO.R.280P.O.MULLASSERY, THRISSUR - 680 509, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY., PIN - 680509BY ADV P.C.SASIDHARAN
RESPONDENTS:
1THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)
NATIONAL FACELESS APPEAL CENTRE, ROOM NO. 356, C.R. BUILDING, IP ESTATE, DELHI- 110002., PIN - 110002BUILDING, IP ESTATE, DELHI- 110002., PIN - 110002
2THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXO/O THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, AYAKAR BHAVAN,MANANCHIRA, KOZHIKODE, KERALA - 673001. , PIN - 673001O/O THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, AYAKAR BHAVAN,MANANCHIRA, KOZHIKODE, KERALA - 673001. , PIN - 6730013THE INCOME TAX OFFICERWARD 1 & TPS, CITY PLAZA, INCOME TAX OFFICE, WEST NADA, GURUVAYOOR, KERALA - 680 101., PIN - 680101WARD 1 & TPS, CITY PLAZA, INCOME TAX OFFICE, WEST NADA, GURUVAYOOR, KERALA - 680 101., PIN - 680101
BY ADV CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
17.11.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 17[th] day of November, 2022
Petitioner is a Primary Agricultural Credit Societyregistered under the Kerala Co-operative SocietiesAct, 1969. Ext.P1 order of assessment was issuedagainst the petitioner. In the assessment order,petitioner's claim for deduction under Section 80P wasrejected on the ground that there was no evidence toshow that petitioner satisfied the ingredients of thePrimary Agricultural Credit Society as contemplatedunder the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act.
2. While assailing the assessment order beforethe 3[rd ]respondent, petitioner has sought to canvassthat the judgment of the Supreme Court in MavilayiService Co-operative Bank Ltd. v. Commissionerof Income Tax; 2021 (1) KLT 485 now governs thefield thereby rendering the assessment itself asincorrect.
WPC No.36540 of 2022
3. Since the petitioner has already preferred an
appeal as Ext.P3 and the same is pendingconsideration before the Income Tax AppellateTribunal (1[st] respondent), I deem it fit that this writpetition be disposed of directing the Tribunal toconsider the appeal in a time bound manner.
4. Accordingly, there will be a direction to the 1[st]respondent to consider and pass appropriate orderson Ext.P3, as expeditiously as possible within a periodof 2 months from the date of receipt of a copy of thisjudgment.
5. Till the disposal of the appeal, no coercivesteps shall be initiated against the petitioner pursuantto Ext.P1.
The writ petition is disposed of as above.
Sd/-
GOPINATH P.
JUDGE
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 36540/2022
PETITIONER’S EXHIBITS:
WPC No.36540 of 2022
3. Since the petitioner has already preferred an
appeal as Ext.P3 and the same is pendingconsideration before the Income Tax AppellateTribunal (1[st] respondent), I deem it fit that this writpetition be disposed of directing the Tribunal toconsider the appeal in a time bound manner.
4. Accordingly, there will be a direction to the 1[st]respondent to consider and pass appropriate orderson Ext.P3, as expeditiously as possible within a periodof 2 months from the date of receipt of a copy of thisjudgment.
5. Till the disposal of the appeal, no coercivesteps shall be initiated against the petitioner pursuantto Ext.P1.
The writ petition is disposed of as above.
Sd/-
GOPINATH P.
JUDGE
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 36540/2022
PETITIONER’S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1EXHIBIT P1:- THE TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DURING THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2020-2021 DATED 28/09/2022 ORDER DURING THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2020-2021 DATED 28/09/2022 EXHIBIT P2EXHIBIT P2:- THE TRUE COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICEDATED 28/09/2022 DATED 28/09/2022 EXHIBIT P3EXHIBIT P3:- THE TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL DATED 26/10/202226/10/2022EXHIBIT P4EXHIBIT P4:- THE TRUE COPY OF THE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT RECEIPT OF INCOME TAX FORMS SHOWING THE FILING OF THE APPEAL ON 26/10/2022ACKNOWLEDGEMENT RECEIPT OF INCOME TAX FORMS SHOWING THE FILING OF THE APPEAL ON 26/10/2022EXHIBIT P5EXHIBIT P5:- THE TRUE COPY OF THE STAY PETITIONDATED 24/10/2022 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORETHE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 24/10/2022 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORETHE 1ST RESPONDENT EXHIBIT P6EXHIBIT P6:- THE TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN W.A.NO.1536 OF 2019 DATED 1/7/2019 W.A.NO.1536 OF 2019 DATED 1/7/2019 EXHIBIT P7EXHIBIT P7:- TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 19.07.2021 IN WPC NO. 14282/2021 OF THIS HONOURABLE COURT19.07.2021 IN WPC NO. 14282/2021 OF THIS HONOURABLE COURTEXHIBIT P8EXHIBIT P8:- TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 27.10.2022 IN WPC 34067/2022 OF THIS HONOURABLECOURT27.10.2022 IN WPC 34067/2022 OF THIS HONOURABLECOURT
RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS:NIL
TRUE COPY
P.A.TO JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.