Case Law › High Court › Windlass Steelcrafts Llp v. Assistant Co...

Windlass Steelcrafts Llp v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax & Ors

High Court 29 Jan 2018 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · dhcdb

Parties

Date of order

29 Jan 2018

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

Case summary

In Windlass Steelcrafts Llp v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax & Ors, the High Court (2018) decided the matter.

Decision: In view of the statement made, the writ petition is disposed of as infructuous.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

$~5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 2946/2017 WINDLASS STEELCRAFTS LLP ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Sanat Kapoor, Advocate. versus ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX & ORS. ..... Respondents Through Mr. Ashok K. Manchanda, Sr. Standing Counsel. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR O R D E R% 29.01.2018 Counsel for the petitioner states that the writ petition has become infructuous as credit of the pre-paid taxes has been given. In view of the statement made, the writ petition is disposed of as infructuous. SANJIV KHANNA, J. JANUARY 29, 2018 MR/VKR CHANDER SHEKHAR, J.

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.