Case Law β€Ί High Court β€Ί Wipro Limited v. The Commissioner Of Inc...

Wipro Limited v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 29 Aug 2017 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court Β· karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Wipro Limited v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
29 Aug 2017
Assessment year(s)
β€”
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Wipro Limited v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2017) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below β€” read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order β€” as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU. DATED THIS THE 29 DAY OF AUGUST 2017 BEFORE THE HON'BLE Dr. JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI WRIT PETITION Nos. 1828$18292 /2016 (T$IT) BETWEEN: WIPRO LIMITEDRBEPRBESEBENTBD BY MANAGBR CORPORATEH TAXATIONSRI.M.K.ANANTHARAMANAGED ABOUT 33 YEARS|/6P AND 80P DODDAKANNELLISARJAPUR ROAD, BANGALORE β€”- 560 035 _ PRTITIONBR (BY SRI.M.LAVA, ADV. FOR)SRI.A.SHANKAR, ADV.) AND: 1.|THE COMMISSIONBR OF INCOME β€”- TAXUNTERNATIONAL TAXATION) |BMTC BUILDINGROOM NO.710, 7 KLOOR,80 FEET ROAD, KORAMANGALABANGALORE β€” 560 095.UNTERNATIONAL TAXATION) |BMTC BUILDINGROOM NO.710, 7 KLOOR,80 FEET ROAD, KORAMANGALABANGALORE β€” 560 095.Β«|THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONEROF INCOME β€” TAX(INTERNATIONAL TAXATION) CIRCLE 2(1), BMTC BUILDINGROOM NO.440, 4 KFLOOR,80 FEET ROAD, 6 BLOCKKORAMANGALA>BANGALORE β€” 560 095.~ RESPONDENTSOF INCOME β€” TAX(INTERNATIONAL TAXATION) CIRCLE 2(1), BMTC BUILDINGROOM NO.440, 4 KFLOOR,80 FEET ROAD, 6 BLOCKKORAMANGALA>BANGALORE β€” 560 095.~ RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.DILIP, ADV. FOR SRI.K.V.ARVIND, ADV.) Vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION) AND ANR. 2/2 THESE W.Ps. ARK FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF|THR CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT R-1 TO)STAY THR RBECOVEBRY OF TAXES TILL DISPOSAL OF THAPPHAL FILED BERKFORE THE LEARNED COMMISSIONER OINCOME TAX (APPEALS) AND ETC., THESE W.Ps. COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HBARINGIN β€˜B’ GROUP THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:- ORDER Mr. M. Lava, for Mr.A. Shankar, Adv. for Petitioner |Mr.Dilip, for Mr.K.V. Arvind, Adv. for Respondents The learned counsel for the petitioner wants to withdraw the petitions. Opposite side has no objection. Memo is taken on record. 2 |The petitions are dismissed as withdrawn. *alb/-. od/-|JUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
βœ… File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) β†’ πŸ’¬ Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only β€” not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press Β· Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
Β© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP Β· LLPIN ACN-4920 Β· Jaipur, Rajasthan