Case LawHigh Court › Withincome Tax Appeal v. Os Itxa 391-18...

Withincome Tax Appeal v. Os Itxa 391-18 Group.doc

High Court 17 Dec 2018 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Withincome Tax Appeal v. Os Itxa 391-18 Group.doc
Date of order
17 Dec 2018
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Withincome Tax Appeal v. Os Itxa 391-18 Group.doc, the High Court (2018) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
PRIYA SOPARKARIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYO.O.C.J. INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 391 OF 2018 WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 58 OF 2018 Commissioner of Income Tax (IT) 3.. Appellant VsMckinsey & Company S.L... Respondent WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 393 OF 2018 Commissioner of Income Tax (IT) 3.. Appellant VsMckinsey & Company Inc., Canada.. Respondent WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 397 OF 2018 Commissioner of Income Tax (IT) 3.. Appellant VsMckinsey & Company Services AB.. Respondent WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 532 OF 2018 Vs Mckinsey & Company Inc., U.K. .. Respondent WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 548 OF 2018 Commissioner of Income Tax (IT) 3.. Appellant VsMckinsey & Company Inc., Malaysia.. Respondent WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 584 OF 2018 Commissioner of Income Tax (IT) 3.. Appellant VsMckinsey & Company Inc., The Netherlands.. RespondentWITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 585 OF 2018 Commissioner of Income Tax (IT) 3.. Appellant VsMckinsey & Company Inc., France.. Respondent WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 595 OF 2018 Commissioner of Income Tax (IT) 3.. Appellant VsMckinsey & Company Inc., Belgium.. Respondent WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 627 OF 2018 Commissioner of Income Tax (IT) 3.. Appellant VsMckinsey & Company Inc., Hong Kong.. Respondent WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 711 OF 2018 Commissioner of Income Tax (IT) 3.. Appellant VsMckinsey & Company Inc., Sweden.. Respondent WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 756 OF 2018 Commissioner of Income Tax (IT) 3.. Appellant VsMckinsey & Company Inc., Norway.. Respondent WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 767 OF 2018 Commissioner of Income Tax (IT) 3.. Appellant VsMckinsey & Company Inc., International.. RespondentWITH INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 2723 OF 2018 Commissioner of Income Tax (IT) 3.. Appellant VsMckinsey & Company Inc., France.. Respondent WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 2725 OF 2018 Commissioner of Income Tax (IT) 3.. Appellant VsMckinsey & Company Inc., U.S... Respondent WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 2766 OF 2018 Commissioner of Income Tax (IT) 3.. Appellant VsMckinsey Incorporated.. Respondent ................... Mr. Tejveer Singh for the Appellant. Mr. Tejveer Singh for the Appellant. Mr. Porus Kaka, Senior Advocate a/w Mr. Divesh Chawla a/wMr. Porus Kaka, Senior Advocate a/w Mr. Divesh Chawla a/w Ms. Prachi Garg i/by M/s DSK Legal for the Respondents. ................... CORAM : AKIL KURESHI & M.S. SANKLECHA, JJ. DATE : DECEMBER 17, 2018. P.C.: 1.Mr. Tejveer Singh, the learned counsel appearing insupport of the appeals, states that he has been instructed towithdraw these appeals. Accordingly, appeals disposed of as withdrawn. No order as to costs. [ M.S. SANKLECHA, J. ] [ AKIL KURESHI, J ]
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan