In Wmp/18602/2021 Of Abdul Azeez Rahamathunisa v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2021) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
W.M.P.No.18602 of 2021
in
W.P.No.17506 of 2021
M.SUNDAR.J.,
Captioned writ miscellaneous petition has been filed to dispense
with the production of original impugned order.
2. The reason is articulated in paragraph No.2 of the supporting
affidavit which reads as follows:
'I state that the impugned order under Section 147 read with Section 144 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 dated 31.05.2021 was issued electronically by the 1st respondent and hence I state that the original of the said order is not placed on record in the present writ proceedings initiated against the respondents on the ground of violation of the principles of natural justice'.
3. Be that as it may, a photocopy of the impugned order has been
filed.
4. Therefore, captioned Writ Miscellaneous Petition is ordered as
prayed for.
mk
25.08.2021(2/3)
M.SUNDAR.J.,
W.M.P.No.18602 of 2021in W.P.No.17506 of 2021
mk
W.M.P.No.18602 of 2021inW.P.No.17506 of 202125.08.2021(2/3)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.