Wmp/19012/2021 Of Smt.alka Jain v. Income Tax Officer
High Court
25 Aug 2021 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Wmp/19012/2021 Of Smt.alka Jain v. Income Tax Officer
Date of order
25 Aug 2021
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wmp/19012/2021 Of Smt.alka Jain v. Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2021) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
W.M.P.No.19012 of 2021in W.P.SR.No.13376 of 2020
W.M.P.No.19012 of 2021inW.P.SR.No.13376 of 2020
M.SUNDAR.J.,
Mr.Ashokapathy of M/s.Pass Associates (Law Firm) on behalf of petitioner/writ petitioner is before this Virtual Court.
2. Captioned Writ Miscellaneous Petition is with a condonation of
delay prayer.
3. Delay sought to be condoned is qua representation in writ
petition after removing objections. The reason is articulated in paragraph
No.3 of supporting affidavit which reads as follows:
'I submit that the above writ petition was filed on 31.01.2020. The Registry was pleased to return the writ petition on 25.02.2020 for the want of certain corrections. Subsequently, due to Covid-19 Lockdown, I was unable to represent the same immediately'.
W.M.P.No.19012 of 2021in W.P.SR.No.13376 of 2020
M.SUNDAR.J.,
mk
4. This Court, having heard the learned counsel for petitioner/writ petitioner, having perused supporting affidavit and having been satisfied
that the reason adduced is acceptable owing to the facts and circumstances of this case, captioned Writ Miscellaneous Petition is ordered as prayed for.
mk
25.08.2021
W.M.P.No.19012 of 2021inW.P.SR.No.13376 of 2020
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue