Wmp/24268/2021 Of Raju Sugumaran v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
29 Oct 2021 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Wmp/24268/2021 Of Raju Sugumaran v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
29 Oct 2021
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wmp/24268/2021 Of Raju Sugumaran v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2021) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
W.M.P.Nos.24268 & 24280 of 2021
in
W.P.Nos.23066 & 23073 of 2021
M.SUNDAR, J.,
Captioned 'writ miscellaneous petitions' ['WMPs'] have been filed
with a prayer to dispense with production of 'original of orders, both dated
29.09.2021 bearing reference Nos. ITBA/AST/S/153C/2021-
22/1036031261(1) and ITBA/AST/S/153C/2021-22/1036031441(1) made
under Section 153C of 'The Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961)'
[hereinafter 'IT Act' for the sake of brevity] which shall hereinafter be collectively referred to as 'impugned orders' for the sake of convenience and clarity.
2. From a perusal of the affidavits filed in support of captioned
WMPs and submission of learned counsel for petitioner/writ petitioner, it
comes to light that the impugned orders have been communicated by way of electronic mail to writ petitioner-assessee, the same have been
downloaded, print outs have been generated and hard copies have been
placed before this Court. This is good enough reason for acceding to dispense with prayer.
3. Therefore, captioned WMPs are ordered as prayed for.
29.10.2021(2/2)
M.SUNDAR, J
gpa
W.M.P.Nos.24268 & 24280 of 2021inW.P.Nos.23066 & 23073 of 2021
29.10.2021(2/2)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.