Wmp/24273/2021 Of Raju Sugumaran v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
29 Oct 2021 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Wmp/24273/2021 Of Raju Sugumaran v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
29 Oct 2021
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wmp/24273/2021 Of Raju Sugumaran v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2021) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
M.SUNDAR, J.,
W.M.P.No.24273 of 2021
inW.P.No.23069 of 2021
Captioned 'writ miscellaneous petition' ['WMP'] has been filed with
a prayer to dispense with production of 'original of order dated 29.09.2021
bearing reference ITBA/AST/S/153C/2021-22/1036031359(1) made under
Section 153C of 'The Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961)' [hereinafter 'IT Act' for the sake of brevity]' [hereinafter 'impugned order' for the sake of convenience and clarity].
2.From a perusal of the affidavit filed in support of captioned WMP
and submission of learned counsel for petitioner/writ petitioner, it comes
to light that the impugned order has been communicated by way of electronic mail to writ petitioner-assessee, the same has been downloaded,
print out has been generated and hard copy has been placed before this
Court. This is good enough reason for acceding to dispense with prayer.
3. Therefore, captioned WMP is ordered as prayed for.
gpa
29.10.2021
(2/2)
W.M.P.No.24273 of 2021in W.P.No.23069 of 2021
M.SUNDAR, J
gpa
W.M.P.No.24273 of 2021inW.P.No.23069 of 2021
29.10.2021(2/2)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.