Wmp/24715/2021 Of Praveen Kumar Pathi v. The Assistant Commissioner (St)-Income Tax
High Court
28 Oct 2021 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Wmp/24715/2021 Of Praveen Kumar Pathi v. The Assistant Commissioner (St)-Income Tax
Date of order
28 Oct 2021
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Wmp/24715/2021 Of Praveen Kumar Pathi v. The Assistant Commissioner (St)-Income Tax, the High Court (2021) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
W.M.P.Nos.24715, 24717 & 24719 of 2021in W.P.Nos.23474, 23477 & 23480 of 2021
W.M.P.Nos.24715, 24717 & 24719 of 2021inW.P.Nos.23474, 23477 & 23480 of 2021
M.SUNDAR, J.,
Captioned 'writ miscellaneous petitions' ['WMPs'] have been filed with
prayers to dispense with production of 'original of impugned Assessment orders dated 29.09.2021 bearing reference Nos.ITBA/AST/S/153C/2021-22/1036030956(1),ITBA/AST/S/153C/2021-22/1036031052(1)and
ITBA/AST/S/153C/2021-22/1036047111(1)' [hereinafter 'impugned orders' collectively for the sake of convenience and clarity] made under Section 153C of 'the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961)' [hereinafter 'IT Act' for the sake of brevity].
2. A perusal of the affidavits filed in support of captioned WMPs and submission of learned counsel for petitioner/writ petitioner, it comes to light
that the impugned orders have been communicated by way of electronic mail to
writ petitioner-assessee, the same have been downloaded, print outs have been
generated and hard copies have been placed before this Court. This is good enough reason for acceding to dispense with prayer.
3. Therefore, captioned WMPs are ordered as prayed for.
kmi
28.10.2021 (1/2)
W.M.P.Nos.24715, 24717 & 24719 of 2021in W.P.Nos.23474, 23477 & 23480 of 2021
M.SUNDAR, J
kmi
W.M.P.Nos.24715, 24717 & 24719 of 2021inW.P.Nos.23474, 23477 & 23480 of 2021
28.10.2021(1/2)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.