In Wmp/2920/2023 Of The Income Tax Officer v. Karangipully Vinothkumar, the High Court (2023) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Accordingly, this petition is allowed as prayed for and a further period of one month is granted to the petitioner / respondent in this W.M.P. to pass final orders in accordance with the directions given by this Court on 07.11.2022 in W.P.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
W.M.P. No.2920 of 2023inW.P. No.29119 of 2022
W.M.P. No.2920 of 2023inW.P. No.29119 of 2022
ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.
This petition has been filed seeking to extend the time to pass final orders pursuant to directions given by this Court on 07.11.2022 in W.P. No.29119 of 2022.
2. Under the aforesaid order of this Court, a direction was issued to the petitioner / respondent in this miscellaneous petition to dispose of the stay application, within a period of six weeks from 07.11.2022. The petitioner seeks for extension of time to pass final orders by another period of one month.
3. The learned counsel for the respondent / writ petitioner has no objection for the same. Accordingly, this petition is allowed as prayed for and a further period of one month is granted to the petitioner / respondent in this W.M.P. to pass final orders in accordance with the directions given by this Court on 07.11.2022 in W.P. No.29119 of 2022.
W.M.P. No.2920 of 2023inW.P. No.29119 of 2022
4. In respect of the extended period, the petitioner in this miscellaneous
petition shall not initiate any coercive steps against the respondent / writ petitioner.
28.02.2023
vsi2
ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.
W.M.P. No.2920 of 2023inW.P. No.29119 of 2022
vsi2
W.M.P. No.2920 of 2023inW.P. No.29119 of 2022
28.02.2023
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.