In Wmp/4516/2023 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Sri Lakshmi Gayathri Aravapalli, the High Court (2023) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
W.M.P.No.4516 of 2023 in W.P.No.6270 of 2020&
W.M.P.No.4820 of 2023 in W.P.No.6273 of 2020
ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.
W.M.P.No.4516 of 2023 has been filed by the Income Tax Department seeking extension of time to comply with the directions given by this Court on 17.10.2022 in W.P.No.6270 of 2020 by another period of two months (60 days) and W.M.P.No.4820 of 2023 in W.P.No.6273 of 2020 has been filed by the Assessee/ Writ Petitioner seeking extension of time for the Appellate Authority to dispose of the appeal by another period of three months to comply with the directions given by this court on 17.10.2022 in W.P.No.6273 of 2020.
2. The respective counsels appearing for the Assessee/Writ Petitioner as well as the Income Tax Department have no objection for allowing both the applications.
3. Accordingly, both W.M.Ps. are allowed as prayed for and time is extended accordingly, as per the time sought for in both the W.M.Ps.
nl
28.02.2023
ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.nl
W.M.P.No.4516 of 2023 in W.P.No.6270 of 2020&W.M.P.No.4820 of 2023 in W.P.No.6273 of 2020
28.02.2023
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue