In Wmp/4949/2023 Of The Income Tax Officer v. Shri. Mahalingam Karthikeyan, the High Court (2023) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
W.M.P.No.4949 of 2023 in W.P.No.2335 of 2019 &W.M.P.No.4950 of 2023 in W.P.No.2339 of 2019
ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.
This Court is satisfied with the reasons contained in the affidavits filed in support of these writ miscellaneous petitions seeking to condone the delay of 162 days in representing the W.M.P.SR87848 of 2022 & W.M.P.SR87845 of 2022.
2. Learned counsel for the writ petitioner has also not raised any serious objection for allowing these petitions. Accordingly, these writ miscellaneous petitions are allowed as prayed for.
3. Registry is directed to number the W.M.P.SR87848 of 2022 & W.M.P.SR87845 of 2022, if it is otherwise in order and list the same along with these writ petitions for hearing on 21.03.2023.
nl
28.02.2023
ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.
nl
W.M.P.No.4949 of 2023 in W.P.No.2335 of 2019 &W.M.P.No.4950 of 2023 in W.P.No.2339 of 2019
28.02.2023
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue