Wp 474 Of 2019.Doc v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
17 Jun 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Wp 474 Of 2019.Doc v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
17 Jun 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Wp 474 Of 2019.Doc v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.
Decision: The Writ Petition is disposed of as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
12 wp 474 of 2019.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.474 OF 2019
Futurestep (Singapore) Pte Ltd. …Petitioner versusDeputy Commissioner of Income Tax,(International Taxation) – 2(3)(1), Mumbaiand Ors. …Respondents
…Respondents
Mr. Nitesh Joshi I/by Mr. Atul Jasani, for Petitioner. Mr. Charanjeet Chanderpal, for Respondents.
CORAM: AKIL KURESHI &
S.J. KATHAWALLA, JJ.
th JUNE, 2019
DATE: 17
P.C.:
1.
The Petitioner has challenged the order of Assessment passed by the
Assessing Officer pursuant to a notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
The learned Counsel for the Petitioner stated that to avail alternate appeal remedy,Petitioner would withdraw the Petition. Permission for withdrawal granted. In view ofthe fact that Petitioner was pursuing remedy in the present Petition, if the Petitioner
files such Appeal latest by 5th July, 2019, the same shall be entertained on merits,ignoring question of limitation. Needless to add all contentions of both the sides arekept open. The Writ Petition is disposed of as withdrawn.
( S.J.KATHAWALLA, J. )
( AKIL KURESHI, J. )
SSP 1/1
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.