Case LawHigh Court › Wp/1001/2018 Of Ritesh Sinha v. Income T...

Wp/1001/2018 Of Ritesh Sinha v. Income Tax Officer-24(3)(4) And 3 Ors

High Court 08 Jun 2018 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Wp/1001/2018 Of Ritesh Sinha v. Income Tax Officer-24(3)(4) And 3 Ors
Date of order
08 Jun 2018
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Wp/1001/2018 Of Ritesh Sinha v. Income Tax Officer-24(3)(4) And 3 Ors, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: 3.Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1001 OF 2018 Mr. Ritesh Sinha .. Petitioner v/s. Income Tax Officer – 24(3)(4) & Ors. ..Respondents None for the petitioner Mr. Suresh Kumar for the respondent - Revenue CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA & SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J.J. P.C. DATED : 8[th] JUNE, 2018. 1.When this petition was called out in the morning session, none appeared in support of the petition. Thus, the matter was kept back at 3.00 p.m. 2.At 3.00 p.m. when the petition is called out, none appears in support of the petition. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting this petition. 3.Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. (SANDEEP K. SHINDE J.) (M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan