Wp/10072/2024 Of Moorthedharara Seva Sahakari Sangha Niyamitha v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax Pcit Panaji
High Court
29 May 2024 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Wp/10072/2024 Of Moorthedharara Seva Sahakari Sangha Niyamitha v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax Pcit Panaji
Date of order
29 May 2024
Assessment year(s)
2019-20
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Wp/10072/2024 Of Moorthedharara Seva Sahakari Sangha Niyamitha v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax Pcit Panaji, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: 10072 of 2024 2.In light of the submission made, petition is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
Digitally signedby VIJAYA PLocation: HIGHCOURT OFKARNATAKA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 29 DAY OF MAY, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV -WRIT PETITION NO. 10072 OF 2024 (TIT)
BETWEEN:
1. MOORTHEDHARARA SEVA SAHAKARI
SANGHA NIYAMITHA A COOPERATIVE SOCIETY REGISTERED UNDER THE
KARNATAKA COOPERATIVE SOCIETY ACT, 1959
REGISTERED ADDRESS AT UPPINANGADY, PUTTUR,
DAKSHINA KANNADA DISTRICT-574 241 REP. BY ITS CEO
SRI DEEKAYYA, SON OF SRI CHENNAPPA POOJARY, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS.
… PETITIONER
(BY SRI. SHREEHARI KUTSA., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
PCIT, PANAJI AAYKAR BHAVAN, PLOT NO. 05 EDC COMPLEX, PATTO PLAZA, PANAJI, GOA-403 001 AN AUTHORITY UNDER THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961
2. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1, PUTTUR THE ASSESSING OFFICER UNDER THE INCOME TAX ACT 1961 INCOME TAX OFFICE, RADHIKA COMPLEX, COURT ROAD, PUTTUR-574 201.
3. NATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTRE A CENTRE DESCRIBED UNDER SECTION 144B OF THE INCOME TAX ACT 1961 ROOM NO. 401, 2 FLOOR, E RAMP, JAWAHARLAL NEHRU STADIUM, DELHI-110 003.
… RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. M. DILIP., JUNIOR STANDING COUNSEL)
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO A) QUASH THE ORDER UNDER SECTION 119(2)(B) OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 DATED 09/12/2022 ISSUED BY THE R1 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2019-20 WHICH BEARS THE DIN VIZ., ITBA/COM/M/17/2022-23/1047950841(1) WHICH IS ENCLOSED AS ANNEXURE-F1 AND ETC.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks
permission to withdraw the petition with liberty to challenge the impugned order afresh.
NC: 2024:KHC:18009
WP No. 10072 of 2024
2.In light of the submission made, petition is
dismissed. Liberty is reserved to challenge the impugned
order afresh. All contentions are kept open.
Sd/- JUDGE
VP
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.