Case LawHigh Court › Wp/101678/2018 Of Shri. Abhaykumar Bhara...

Wp/101678/2018 Of Shri. Abhaykumar Bharamgouda Patil v. The Income Tax Officer

High Court 10 Oct 2018 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · karhcdharwad
Parties
Wp/101678/2018 Of Shri. Abhaykumar Bharamgouda Patil v. The Income Tax Officer
Date of order
10 Oct 2018
Assessment year(s)
2010-11
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Wp/101678/2018 Of Shri. Abhaykumar Bharamgouda Patil v. The Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: In view of the same, the petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 10 DAY OF OCTOBER, 2018 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S. SUNIL DUTT YADAV -WRIT PETITION NO.101678/2018 (TIT) BETWEEN: SHRI. ABHAYKUMAR BHARAMGOUDA PATIL S/O BHARAMGOUDA PATIL, AGED: 47 YEARS, R/AT: NO.24, MALINI, BASAVANGALLI, HOSUR, SHAHAPUR, BELAGAVI-590 003. ...PETITIONER (BY SRI.RAVIRAJ C PATIL, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1 (2), FIROZKHIMJIBHAI COMMERCIAL COMPLEX, OPP. CIVIL HOSPITAL, DR.AMBEDKAR ROAD, BELAGAVI-590 001. WARD-1 (2), FIROZKHIMJIBHAI COMMERCIAL COMPLEX, OPP. CIVIL HOSPITAL, DR.AMBEDKAR ROAD, BELAGAVI-590 001. 2. THE ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, FIROZKHIMJIBHAIA COMMERCIAL COMPLEX, OPP. CIVIL HOSPITAL, DR.AMBEDKAR ROAD, BELAGAVI-590 001. 3. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, FIROZKHIMJIBHAIA COMMERCIAL COMPLEX, OPP. CIVIL HOSPITAL, DR.AMBEDKAR ROAD, BELAGAVI-590 001. 4. THE REGISTRAR, INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PANAJI BENCH, PUNDALIK NIVAS, 1 FLOOR, NEAR PATTOO FOOT BRIDGE, PANAJI-403 001. ...RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, TO CONSIDER THE APPLICATION FOR INTERIM STAY PENDING BEFORE IT IN RESPECT OF THE A.Y.2010-11 IN THE CASE OF THE ASSESSEE WHICH IS PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-D. THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT, MADE THE FOLLOWING: ORDER The petitioner has filed a memo stating that the present petition has become infructuous since the appeal in connection with which the present proceedings have been initiated has been disposed of. In view of the same, the petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sh Sd/- JUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan