Wp/101707/2022 Of Vimal Promoters And Developers Pvt. Ltd v. The Income Tax Officer
High Court
22 Apr 2022 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karhcdharwad
Parties
Wp/101707/2022 Of Vimal Promoters And Developers Pvt. Ltd v. The Income Tax Officer
Date of order
22 Apr 2022
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Wp/101707/2022 Of Vimal Promoters And Developers Pvt. Ltd v. The Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2022) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 5.Writ petition is accordingly allowed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 22 DAY OF APRIL, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.S.SANJAY GOWDA
-WRIT PETITION No.101707/2022 (TIT)
BETWEEN:
THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI AND QUASH THE IMPUGNED ASSESSMENT ORDER AND DEMAND 20-04-2021 VIDE ANNEXURE-A AND B PASSED BY THE SECOND RESPONDENT IT DEPT. NATIONAL E- ASSESSMENT
WP No. 101707 of 2022
CENTRE, DELHI IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY AND ETC.,
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
In this writ petition, Annexures-A and B, the orders of assessment and a consequential demand has been challenged principally on the ground that the petitioner was not afforded an opportunity of hearing before the special order was passed.
2.Learned counsel for the Revenue submitted that notices were sent by e-mail to the registered e-mail address and since there was no response, the impugned order was passed.
3.The above facts indicate that admittedly, the petitioner was not afforded an opportunity of hearing as contemplated under the Income Tax Act and Rules and as a consequence, the order of assessment and the consequential demand made cannot be sustained and the same are accordingly quashed.
WP No. 101707 of 2022
4.The matter shall stand remanded to the 2[nd]respondent who shall afford an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and thereafter pass an appropriate order in accordance with law.
5.Writ petition is accordingly allowed.
(Sd/-)
JUDGE
Jm/-
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.