Case LawHigh Court › Wp/10/2006 Of Smt. Tarabai Kotumal Pahla...

Wp/10/2006 Of Smt. Tarabai Kotumal Pahlajani v. Commissioner Of Income Tax City-Xiv, Mumbai

High Court 12 Jun 2006 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Wp/10/2006 Of Smt. Tarabai Kotumal Pahlajani v. Commissioner Of Income Tax City-Xiv, Mumbai
Date of order
12 Jun 2006
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Wp/10/2006 Of Smt. Tarabai Kotumal Pahlajani v. Commissioner Of Income Tax City-Xiv, Mumbai, the High Court (2006) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARYORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITON NO.10 OF 2006 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY WRIT PETITON NO.10 OF 2006 WITH WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.17 OF 2006 INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.17 OF 2006 Smt.Tarabai Kotumal Pahlajani ..Petitioner. /Appellant. V/s. The Commissioner of Income Tax & Ors. ..Respondents. Mr.Jitendra Jain i/b. RMG Law Associates for petitioner / appellant. Mr.S.M.Shah for respondents. CORAM : V.C. DAGA AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 12TH JUNE, 2006. P.C. :- P.C. :- In view of the purshis filed, the learned counsel for the petitioner is allowed to withdraw the Writ Petition as well as the Income Tax Appeal referred to in this pursis dated 12/6/2006 reserving liberty to agitate the issue of validity of revisional proceedings at appropriate stage. The pursis is taken on record and marked ‘X’ for identification. Writ Petition No.10 of 2006 as well as Income Tax Appeal No.17 of 2006 stand dismissed as withdrawn with liberty reserved in favour of the petitioner / appellant. No order as to costs. (V.C. DAGA, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan