Wp/10/2006 Of Smt. Tarabai Kotumal Pahlajani v. Commissioner Of Income Tax City-Xiv, Mumbai
High Court
12 Jun 2006 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Wp/10/2006 Of Smt. Tarabai Kotumal Pahlajani v. Commissioner Of Income Tax City-Xiv, Mumbai
Date of order
12 Jun 2006
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp/10/2006 Of Smt. Tarabai Kotumal Pahlajani v. Commissioner Of Income Tax City-Xiv, Mumbai, the High Court (2006) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARYORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITON NO.10 OF 2006
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY
WRIT PETITON NO.10 OF 2006
WITH
WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.17 OF 2006
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.17 OF 2006
Smt.Tarabai Kotumal Pahlajani ..Petitioner.
/Appellant.
V/s.
The Commissioner of Income Tax & Ors. ..Respondents.
Mr.Jitendra Jain i/b. RMG Law Associates for
petitioner / appellant.
Mr.S.M.Shah for respondents.
CORAM : V.C. DAGA AND
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 12TH JUNE, 2006.
P.C. :-
P.C. :-
In view of the purshis filed, the learned
counsel for the petitioner is allowed to withdraw the
Writ Petition as well as the Income Tax Appeal referred
to in this pursis dated 12/6/2006 reserving liberty to
agitate the issue of validity of revisional proceedings
at appropriate stage. The pursis is taken on record
and marked ‘X’ for identification.
Writ Petition No.10 of 2006 as well as
Income Tax Appeal No.17 of 2006 stand dismissed as
withdrawn with liberty reserved in favour of the
petitioner / appellant. No order as to costs.
(V.C. DAGA, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.