Wp/10201/2021 Of Edwin Paul Manoharan v. The Additional Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
15 Jun 2022 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Wp/10201/2021 Of Edwin Paul Manoharan v. The Additional Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
15 Jun 2022
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Wp/10201/2021 Of Edwin Paul Manoharan v. The Additional Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2022) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: This writ petition is allowed in the aforesaid terms.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated: 15.06.2022
THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH
Edwin Paul Manoharan ...Petitioner
The Additional Commissioner of Income Tax,National e-Assessment Centre,Delhi. ...Respondent
Prayer:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to callfortherecordsoftherespondentin ITBA/AST/S/143(3)/2020-21/1032097369(1) dated 31.03.2021 and quash the same and direct the respondent to consider the objections dated 25.03.2021.
ORDER
Order of assessment dated 31.03.2021 is assailed mainly on the ground of principles of natural justice. There is no dispute on the position that the principles of natural justice have been violated in this case, insofar as learned revenue counsel would fairly point out that the response of the petitioner dated 25.03.2021 to the show cause notice dated 31.03.2021 has not been taken into account by the Officer while finalising the assessment.
2. The reason for this is that while the show cause notice permitted the assessee to file its reply by 23:59 hours
on 23.03.2021, the internal records of the respondent appear to contain an internal noting that the reply be received by 10:30 am by 25.03.2021.
3. In these circumstances and based on the internal noting, the portal was shut on 25.03.2021 at 10.30 am itself, and it is for this reason that the Assessing Officer did not have the benefit of the response of the assessee. If this submission were to be accepted, then the assessee should have been unable to upload the reply as the portal would not have been accessible.
4. However, and admittedly, the response of the petitioner has been acknowledged and the same is available at pages 28 and 29 of the compilation accompanying the writ affidavit.The impugned order of assessment is thus violative of the principles of natural justice and for this reason, is set aside.
5. The assessee will be heard by the respondent by issue of notice, objections dated 25.03.2022, be taken into account and the assessment finalized expeditiously, and in any event, within a period of 90 days from date of issuance of a copy of this order.
6. This writ petition is allowed in the aforesaid terms. Connected writ miscellaneous petition is closed. No Costs.
True Copy
Sub-Assistant Registrar
nstToThe Additional Commissioner of Income Tax,National e-Assessment Centre,Delhi.
+1 CC to Mr.R.Kumar, Advocate sr 35474
AJS(CO)SP(27/07/2022)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.