Wp/102593/2015 Of The Kanara District Central v. The Principal Commissioner Of Income-Tax
High Court
19 Aug 2015 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · karhcdharwad
Parties
Wp/102593/2015 Of The Kanara District Central v. The Principal Commissioner Of Income-Tax
Date of order
19 Aug 2015
Assessment year(s)
2012-13
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Wp/102593/2015 Of The Kanara District Central v. The Principal Commissioner Of Income-Tax, the High Court (2015) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: This petition is dismissed as withdrawn reserving the liberties to approach this Court again if a fresh cause of actioncrops up.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 19 DAY OF AUGUST, 2015
BEEORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK B. HINCHIGERI
#WRIT PETITION No.102593 OF 2015 (1IT)
BETWEEN:
The Kanara District CentralCo-operative Bank Ltd.,Represented by Managing Director —Shriprakash Madaeunt,Son of Dattatreyea Madaguni,Aged about 59 years,Market Yard, Sirs1,Uttara Kannada — 581 402.
_.. Petitioner
(By Sri A.Shankar, Sri M.Lava andsti Shankar S.Hegde, Advocates)
AND:
1]The Principal Commissioner of Income-Tax,Central Revenue Building, Navnagar,Hubballi — 580 025.
? The Joint Commissioner of Income- TaxRange 1, Central Revenue Building,Navnagar,Hubballi — 580 025.
crThe Commissioner of Income- Ja
(Appeals) — Hubballi Central
Revenue Building, Navnagar,
Hubballt — 580 025. ... Respondents
This writ petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of theConstitution of India praying to stay the recovery of disputed taxesand interest as the amount mentioned in the notice of demandissued under Section 156 of the Act to the petitioner vide dated16.02.2015 by the respondent No.2 as referred in Annexure-A tilldisposal of the appeals filed by the petitioner before the respondentNo.3 for assessment year 2012-13 pursuant to the order ofassessment passed under Section 143(3) of the Act dated 16.02.2015by the respondent No.2, etc.
This writ petition coming on for orders, this day, the Courtmade the following;
ORDER
The petitioner’s side has filed a memo seeking leave of the
Court to withdraw this petition with the liberty to file a freshpetition, if required in future,
2. This petition is dismissed as withdrawn reserving the
liberties to approach this Court again if a fresh cause of actioncrops up.
Cm/-
Sd/-
JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.