Wp/103786/2015 Of Shri. Murugesh Nirani Credit v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) Belagavi
High Court
04 Sep 2024 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · karhcdharwad
Parties
Wp/103786/2015 Of Shri. Murugesh Nirani Credit v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) Belagavi
Date of order
04 Sep 2024
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp/103786/2015 Of Shri. Murugesh Nirani Credit v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) Belagavi, the High Court (2024) decided the matter.
Decision: Resultantly, the Writ Petition is disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
Digitally signed byTHEJASKUMAR NLocation: HIGHCOURT OFKARNATAKA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 4 DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI -WRIT PETITION NO. 103786 OF 2015 (TIT)
BETWEEN:
SHRI. MURUGESH NIRANI CREDIT SOUHARDA SAHAKARI LIMITED, M.G.ROAD, KAVALI GATE, VIJAYAPURA, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT, ANILKUMAR DESHPANDE, AGE: 48 YEARS, OCC: SERVICE, R/O: VIJAYAPURA.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. KRISHNA KUMAR JOSHI., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. SANGRAM.S.KULKARNI., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS), BELAGAVI, KHIMJIBHAI BUILDING, OPP. CIVIL HOSPITAL, BELAGAVI. 2. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD NO.1, VIJAYAPURA AAYKAR BHAVAN, NEAR AIR, ATHANI ROAD, VIJAYAPUR. …RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. M.THIRUMALESH., ADVOCATE FOR R1-R2)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS.
- 2 -
THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER
Sri.Krishna Kumar Joshi., counsel on behalf of
Sri.Sangram S.Kulkarni., for the petitioner has appeared in person.
Sri.M.Thirumalesh., counsel for the respondents has appeared through video conferencing.
2. The captioned Writ Petition is filed seeking a Writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent to dispose of the appeal preferred by the petitioner.
3. Counsel Sri.M.Thirumalesh., submits that the
appeal preferred by the petitioner has been disposed of on 29.05.2020. Hence, an appropriate order may be passed.
Counsel for the petitioner acknowledges the said submission.
The oral submission made by counsel for the respective parties is placed on record.
- 3 -
4. Suffice it to note that the Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, Vijayapura passed an assessment order on 30.01.2015 under Section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The same was assailed before the Appellate Tribunal in CAT Appeal No.182 – 183/2019 and the said appeals are disposed of on 29.05.2020. Hence, nothing survives for consideration in the captioned Writ Petition.
5. Resultantly, the Writ Petition is disposed of.
TKN
LIST NO.: 2 SL NO.: 34
Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.