Wp/103837/2022 Of Sri Hanamesh Basapattana v. The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
12 Aug 2024 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · karhcdharwad
Parties
Wp/103837/2022 Of Sri Hanamesh Basapattana v. The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
12 Aug 2024
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Wp/103837/2022 Of Sri Hanamesh Basapattana v. The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
Digitally signed byPREMCHANDRA M RLocation: HIGHCOURT OFKARNATAKA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 12 DAY OF AUGUST, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI -WRIT PETITION NO. 103837 OF 2022 (TIT)
BETWEEN:
SRI. HANAMESH BASAPATTANA S/O GANGAPPA BASAPATTANA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/AT: SINGANAL, TALUK: GANGVATHI, DISTRICT: KOPPAL-583 227.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. PRAKASH.R.BADIGER., ADVOCATE )
AND:
1. THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, QUEEN’S ROAD, BENGALURU-560 009. OF INCOME TAX, QUEEN’S ROAD, BENGALURU-560 009.
2. THE INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, NATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTER, DELHI.
…RESPONDENTS
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226
AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS.
THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER
When the matter is called, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, either personally or through video conferencing.
As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the petition was listed on 28.09.2022, on that day, two weeks time was granted to do the needful. Again, the petition was listed on 03.06.2024, on that day, two weeks time was granted to rectify the objections raised by the Registry. Despite granting time, office objections were not complied with.
The petition is listed today for orders regarding non-compliance of office objections. A perusal of the entire order sheet reveals that despite giving sufficient opportunities, the office objections are not complied with. Furthermore, the petition is of the year 2022. Now we are in the month of August 2024. The petition is pending for almost two years. As already noted above, when the matter is called, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, either personally or through video conferencing. It appears that the petitioner is not diligent in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the Writ Petition is
NC: 2024:KHC-D:11411WP No. 103837 of 2022
dismissed for non-prosecution and also for non-compliance of
office objections.
Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE
MRP, TKN LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 18
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.