Case Law › High Court › Wp/104161/2019 Of Shiva Creditsouhard Cr...

Wp/104161/2019 Of Shiva Creditsouhard Credit Sahakari Niyamit v. The Income Tax Officer

High Court 17 Feb 2020 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · karhcdharwad

Parties

Date of order

17 Feb 2020

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Wp/104161/2019 Of Shiva Creditsouhard Credit Sahakari Niyamit v. The Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2020) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 17 DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2020 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE S.G. PANDIT -WRIT PETITION NO.104161/2019 (TRES) BETWEEN: SHIVA CREDIT SOUHARD CREDIT SAHAKARI NIYAMIT, BELAGAVI, HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT LIG-41/4, MAHANTESH NAGAR, BELAGAVI 590010, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, SHRI NITIN S/O SHASHIKANT BANAKAR, AGE:52 YEARS, OCC:SECRETARY, R/O:M.M.EXTENSION, BELAGAVI 590017. ….PETITIONER (BY SRI SANGRAM S.KULKARNI, ADV.) AND: THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD NO.2(2), OPP:CIVIL HOSPITAL, BELAGAVI. …RESPONDENT THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER NO.F.NO.ITO/W-2(2)/BGV/2018-19 DATED 11.01.2019 VIDE ANNEXURE-E ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT AND ETC., THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petition has become infructuous. Submission is placed on record. Writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- JUDGE Jm/-

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.