Case LawHigh Court › Wp/104533/2024 Of Sri. Janardhan Dada Pa...

Wp/104533/2024 Of Sri. Janardhan Dada Patil v. The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 25 Apr 2025 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · karhcdharwad
Parties
Wp/104533/2024 Of Sri. Janardhan Dada Patil v. The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
25 Apr 2025
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Wp/104533/2024 Of Sri. Janardhan Dada Patil v. The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2025) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: The Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawnin terms of the memo.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Digitally signed byPREMCHANDRA M RLocation: HIGHCOURT OFKARNATAKA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 25 DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI -WRIT PETITION NO. 104533 OF 2024 (TRES) BETWEEN: SRI. JANARDHAN DADA PATIL S/O SRI. DADA PATIL, AGED BOUT 54 YEARS, NEAR ISHWAR TEMPLE, NEW PORT, CBT, HUBBALLI-580 020, PAN NO: . … PETITIONER (BY SRI. ABHISHEK G. HOSAKER, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. RAGHAVENDRA B. HANJER, ADVOCATE) SRI. RAGHAVENDRA B. HANJER, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, C.R. BUILDINGS, NAVANAGAR, P.B. ROAD, HUBLI-580 025. C.R. BUILDINGS, NAVANAGAR, P.B. ROAD, HUBLI-580 025. 2. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(1), HUBBALLI-580 025. 3. THE DEPUTY/ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, KOZHIKODE, OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, KOZHIKODE, … RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Sri.Abhishek G.Hosaker., counsel on behalf of Sri.Raghavendra B.Hanjer., for the petitioner has appeared in person and submits that a memo has been filed and the Writ Petition may be dismissed as withdrawn in terms of the memo. 2. The oral submission made by counsel for the petitioner and the memo is placed on record. 3. The Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawnin terms of the memo. MRP/RH LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 24 Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan